Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-13 Thread Norm Baugher
Well Doug, if you weren't such an asshole we wouldn't be having this discussion now, would we? Geez, Norm Doug Brewer wrote: > On May 11, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > > >> On 12/05/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> When it's healthy, yes. When it

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-12 Thread Graywolf
My rule of thumb is if they don't get my point within 3 tries, they aren't going to get it at all. Mark Roberts wrote: > Doug Brewer wrote: > > >> On May 11, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: >> >>> No hand-wringing, just discussion, surely you can appreciate that? >>> >>>

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Tom C
There's limits on our freedoms of speech over here Rob. Just a friendly jab , Doug. Tom C. >From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: off line for a few days >Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Mark Roberts
Doug Brewer wrote: >On May 11, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: >> >> No hand-wringing, just discussion, surely you can appreciate that? >> > >When it's healthy, yes. When it gets repeated for 200 messages, >not so much. I don't know where the dividing line between "healthy" and "h

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Doug Brewer
On May 11, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > On 12/05/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> When it's healthy, yes. When it gets repeated for 200 messages, not >> so much. > > Your call, I'll keep it off-list. > > -- > Rob Studdert See, this is a perfect illustration of

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 12/05/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When it's healthy, yes. When it gets repeated for 200 messages, not > so much. Your call, I'll keep it off-list. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distud

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Doug Brewer
On May 11, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > > No hand-wringing, just discussion, surely you can appreciate that? > > -- > Rob Studdert When it's healthy, yes. When it gets repeated for 200 messages, not so much. Doug Brewer http://www.drivingtheflies.com -- PDML Pentax-Di

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread David J Brooks
Ok lads and ladesses Time to let this go and move on. You'v woken the list guy up. He does not like that.:-) Dave On 5/11/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/05/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Nobody said it wasn't a valid topic. > > > > Not being will

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 12/05/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nobody said it wasn't a valid topic. > > Not being willing to engage in hand-wringing doesn't mean I'm > oblivious. I'm perfectly aware of where Pentax sits in the world, > thanks. No hand-wringing, just discussion, surely you can appreciate t

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Doug Brewer
On May 11, 2007, at 6:27 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > On 12/05/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Far as my opinion, I've been here eleven years, and for all eleven of >> those years, a running topic has been that Pentax is thisclose to >> going >> toes up, probably before the

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 12/05/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Far as my opinion, I've been here eleven years, and for all eleven of > those years, a running topic has been that Pentax is thisclose to going > toes up, probably before the sun sets again. I didn't believe it then, I > don't believe it now.

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Tom C
: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: off line for a few days >Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:17:13 -0400 > >Tom C wrote: > > > Doug, > > > > I often fail to understand where you are

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Doug Brewer
Tom C wrote: > Doug, > > I often fail to understand where you are coming from. Probably my fault. > > Of all the crap that come across the list, you decide to pick on me? Why > would you say I'm completely dismissive of others? Because I'm expressing my > own opinions, not theirs, or possibl

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Tom C
>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Tom C wrote: > > >>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>I've killfiled that thread, > > > >Ostrich. > >All the information of any value in that thread was presented *long* >before I killfiled it. All that's left now is a dick-waving contest for

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Mark Roberts
Tom C wrote: >>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>I've killfiled that thread, > >Ostrich. All the information of any value in that thread was presented *long* before I killfiled it. All that's left now is a dick-waving contest for people determined to convince us all of their vast know

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Tom C
>From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: off line for a few days >Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 13:05:44 -0400 > >Tom C wrote: > > > > What's wrong with a little good natured humo

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Doug Brewer
Tom C wrote: > > What's wrong with a little good natured humor? I get whacked up side the > head plenty here? > > Tom C. I dunno, maybe the dozens of messages on the subject in which you have been completely humorless and dismissive of others' opinions as those of "cheerleaders" because they

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
No need. My system will collect them for me. I can discard at will when I get home. I'm not unsubscribing, just not going to have a computer near me starting in about 15 minutes for two blessed days. ;-) G On May 11, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > >> Can't

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Tom C
>From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: off line for a few days >Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:36:52 -0400 > >Tom C wrote: > >>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Doug Brewer
Tom C wrote: >>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>I've killfiled that thread, > > > Ostrich. > > Tom C. > > > Is that really necessary? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Tom C
>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I've killfiled that thread, Ostrich. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Mark Roberts
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >Can't wait to see where the Pentax Business ruminations have led >when I return. Keep up the good work! I've killfiled that thread, but I can route all the relevant messages into a separate location, archive them all and send 'em to you when you get back. OK? I mean, w

Re: off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread David J Brooks
Have fun. The folks on the Pentax forums(I joined it Tuesday) group are all in a tizzy about the MF stuff.:-) Dave On 5/11/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm off to the Sierras for the weekend. K10D kit and maybe the P645 > are coming along. Figure I should do some photography

off line for a few days

2007-05-11 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I'm off to the Sierras for the weekend. K10D kit and maybe the P645 are coming along. Figure I should do some photography for a little while. Can't wait to see where the Pentax Business ruminations have led when I return. Keep up the good work! usw Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List