Nice idea, but really not practical.
Collin
At 04:29 PM 6/25/01 -0400, you wrote:
> Reading bits a pieces of the discussion regarding the quite possible
>development of a CCD back by members of this very list got me thinking of
>some other useful possibilities. Right now a super program is pretty much
>what I shoot with about 90% of the time. I don't have a TTL flash, but
>hearsay is that the TTL capabilities of the super-program are pretty bestial,
>particularly for fill-flash applications. With people having such an
>astounding knowledge of computer programming, solid-state electronics, as
>well as plain old photographic know how, could not the electronics of the
>super-program be upgraded? Similar to souping-up the electronics in a high
>performance sports car to get better gas mileage or accelerate better, etc.
>Surely this is possible. Has anyone ever done it, tried it, thought about it?
>Would the operation mean more than programming a chip which would replace the
>current ones? Could the super-program be capable of a more user friendly
>flash operation, or am I dreaming of too much for antiquated technology?
>
>Brent
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
