Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-19 Thread Cory Papenfuss
> strong ego-driven component. This leads to several undesirable symptoms. > One, as you have noticed, is a tendency to overlook (if not downright > ignore) certain sections of the (potential) user community; "If I don't > need this, then I don't see why anybody else should, either". Another > is

Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-19 Thread John Francis
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:32:08AM -0400, Cory Papenfuss wrote: > > yes, currently there are two. one is the relatively old Cinepaint, > > which was a fork of gimp (www.cinepaint.org). right now it uses > > gtk+-1.x but they are in the process of shifting to fltk. > > > > the other one is the rela

Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-19 Thread Adam Maas
Cinepaint, which has been around for a while, does 32 bit and 16 bit editing. Very obtuse interface. -Adam Jostein Øksne wrote: > Been away from Linux for very long. > > Are there any 16-bit image editors for Linux yet? I remember this was > one of the main features absent from GIMP back when.

Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-19 Thread Cory Papenfuss
> about the monitor calibration, perhaps you know this already, but have > you tried lprof? > > http://lprof.sourceforge.net/ > Yeah... I know of it. When I first started to get interested in color management a year or so ago, lprof had pretty much died on the vine. It's great that

Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-19 Thread SJ
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said, I use cinepaint for manipulation of color-managed > digital photos. Unfortunately, monitor calibration is still more or > less nonexistant. Since I rarely do any adjustments other than > brigh

Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-19 Thread Cory Papenfuss
> yes, currently there are two. one is the relatively old Cinepaint, > which was a fork of gimp (www.cinepaint.org). right now it uses > gtk+-1.x but they are in the process of shifting to fltk. > > the other one is the relatively new Krita (www.koffice.org/krita) > which is a part of the Koffice

Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-19 Thread SJ
hi, yes, currently there are two. one is the relatively old Cinepaint, which was a fork of gimp (www.cinepaint.org). right now it uses gtk+-1.x but they are in the process of shifting to fltk. the other one is the relatively new Krita (www.koffice.org/krita) which is a part of the Koffice package

Re: raw therapee for linux

2006-10-18 Thread Jostein Øksne
Been away from Linux for very long. Are there any 16-bit image editors for Linux yet? I remember this was one of the main features absent from GIMP back when. Jostein On 10/19/06, SJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > for those of you on linux, raw therapee-1.1-pre5 is available for linux > (h

raw therapee for linux

2006-10-18 Thread SJ
hi, for those of you on linux, raw therapee-1.1-pre5 is available for linux (http://www.rawtherapee.com/download.html). no sources, only binary, but seems much much better than what has so far been available. of course, there is also a windows version there.. regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Di