From: "Amy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unfortunately almost everything turned out underexposed. I previewed
every shot on the screen and they looked fine there. G. Maybe I need
to take a laptop to check the images. I can fix the exposure with
acceptable results in PS. I shot everything RAW.
It
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. november 2004 21:54
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: shot first event with *istD...
"Amy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Unfortunately almost everything turned out underexposed. I previewed
>every shot on the screen and they looked
On 8 Nov 2004 at 13:12, Amy Hughes wrote:
> Unfortunately almost everything turned out underexposed. I previewed
> every shot on the screen and they looked fine there. G. Maybe I need
> to take a laptop to check the images. I can fix the exposure with
> acceptable results in PS. I shot everyth
"Amy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Unfortunately almost everything turned out underexposed. I previewed
>every shot on the screen and they looked fine there.
What do you mean by "previewed"? Did you check the histogram or just
look at the photo? The histogram is how you determine whether t
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. november 2004 14:36
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: shot first event with *istD...
> Unfor
> Unfortunately almost everything
turned out
underexposed. I previewed
> every shot on the screen and they looked fine there. G. Maybe I need
> to take a laptop to check the images. I can fix the exposure with
> acceptable results in PS. I shot everythi
I used the *istD to shoot a toy train show for the first time this last
weekend. I took only my new Sigma 18-50, a monopod, and used only the
built-in flash. This was supposed to work much better than my P&S and be
so much easier than film (the objective is web photos).
Unfortunately almost everyt
7 matches
Mail list logo
