I'm curious what the gigantic 80-210/4.5 SMC-T lens could do!
DJE
Same normal zoom behaviour...
I will check the 3.5 version tomorrow (K-mount, as long as the 4.5 but fat).
85-210mm to be exact.
Andre
I checked my 85-210mm f/3.5 and distorsion is noticably better
corrected than in the 4.5 lens (
I'm curious what the gigantic 80-210/4.5 SMC-T lens could do!
DJE
Same normal zoom behaviour...
I will check the 3.5 version tomorrow (K-mount, as long as the 4.5 but fat).
85-210mm to be exact.
Andre
Hi William,
Thanks for that observation.
All good info to put away for reference...
keith whaley
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: zoom distortion
Are you sure about that ?
If I were a pro with a very expensive Canon kit, for ins
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, William Robb wrote:
> Both the EF 28-70 f/2.8 and 70 (80) - 200 f/2.8 suffer from barrel
> distortion. In addition, the 28-70 has bad veiling flare and poor
> contrast.
>
> This is just judging the lens from printing negatives that came our
> from behind those lenses.
My daug
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Whaley"
Subject: Re: zoom distortion
> Are you sure about that ?
> If I were a pro with a very expensive Canon kit, for instance, I'd
> really get upset with Canon if I found distortion at one end or the
other.
> That's
AFAIK, no asymmetrical lens (all 35mm lenses I know of) is going to be
distortion free. Most high-end lenses are corrected to within about 1-2% these
days, but that is still visible to the naked eye if you look closely. Zooms are
the most difficult to correct (usually barrel at the wide end, pin
> I've bought the famous Pentax Zoom A 70/210 4 but i'm a little bit
> disapointed because there are
> pincushion distortions.
> When I take a picture, for exemple, of a painting, the borders are deformed.
>
> Is it normal ? For me it's important because I do a lot of architectural
> photos.
As I
7 matches
Mail list logo
