Steve Spencer wrote:
Just want to make sure this package is actually newer. I'm getting this
message when I attempt to update the recursor on an CentOS5.x box:
rpm -Uvh pdns-recursor-3.2-1.i386.rpm
Preparing...###
[100%]
I've now stuck a little bit in the FAQ with regards to this - hopefully any
future users will be able to find this with minimal effort and prevent any lost
time.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com
[mailto:pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On
Hi list
We upgraded our resolvers to 3.2 (Centos5, 64bit)
After the upgrade, the setting max-negative-ttl=30 does not seem to work
anymore. New records take up several minutes until they show up in the
cache.
Even if we explicitely perform a rec_control wipe-cache on those new A
record we get
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Oli Schacher wrote:
Hi list
We upgraded our resolvers to 3.2 (Centos5, 64bit)
After the upgrade, the setting max-negative-ttl=30 does not seem to work
anymore. New records take up several minutes until they show up in the
cache.
Even if we
bert hubert schrieb:
For now, you could solve this problem by setting packet-cache-ttl to a lower
number, say 20 seconds.
Thanks a lot for your quick reply, this seems to help, new records show
up much faster now.
Can you also open tickets on http://wiki.powerdns.com (login with the
2010/3/8 Christian Kuehn christian.ku...@mcs.de
Hi All,
try to compile the new recursor and get finally this error:
got the same error.
Solaris10 is bundled with (/usr/sfw/bin/gcc --version) and gcc3 does not
recognize the -pthreads arguments
= use gcc4 (blastwave for eg)
i use:
Anyone,
Assuming a reasonably performing backend (mysql?) what hardware will be
required for powerdns to answer 70,000q/sec of normal traffic (I'm not
sure I know how to define that!).
Tia,
Zane
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Anyone,
Assuming a reasonably performing backend (mysql?) what hardware will be
required for powerdns to answer 70,000q/sec of normal traffic (I'm not
sure I know how to define that!).
Tia,
Zane
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Hi all,
I have just upgraded from PowerDNS recursor 3.1.7.2 to 3.2. Unfortunately it
appears the TTLs for records are never decremented.
For the meantime I have reverted to 3.1.7.2. Is anyone else experiencing this
problem?
Regards
Paul Wollner
___
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:35:22PM +0200, Paul Wollner wrote:
I have just upgraded from PowerDNS recursor 3.1.7.2 to 3.2. Unfortunately it
appears the TTLs for records are never decremented.
For the meantime I have reverted to 3.1.7.2. Is anyone else experiencing this
problem?
Try
10 matches
Mail list logo
