On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 12:32:08PM -0600, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> I tested this on an isolated server where outside queries wouldn't
> affect the cache - and it did the same thing. So, what i'm
> wondering, is if its rejecting the first two queries, how is it
> getting the final positive response?
On 4/5/10 11:16 AM, bert hubert wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:11:50AM -0600, Brielle Bruns wrote:
The way I read your message was that it always fails via IPv6, but never via
IPv4 - can you elaborate a bit?
The default 'allow all' for IPv4 recursion may have been a mistake, a
mistake we're
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:11:50AM -0600, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> >The way I read your message was that it always fails via IPv6, but never via
> >IPv4 - can you elaborate a bit?
> >
> >The default 'allow all' for IPv4 recursion may have been a mistake, a
> >mistake we're not repeating for IPv6.
> D
On 4/5/10 9:01 AM, bert hubert wrote:
Brielle,
The way I read your message was that it always fails via IPv6, but never via
IPv4 - can you elaborate a bit?
The default 'allow all' for IPv4 recursion may have been a mistake, a
mistake we're not repeating for IPv6.
During testing, it was fai
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:30:59AM -0600, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> So, if allow-recursion is commented out, even though it allows all
> ipv4, there's something weird with the way it handles ipv6 that
> makes it fail some of the time, succeed other times. But yet, if I
> put in an allow for ::/0 it s
