I've compared the master and first slave DNS server, and I noticed a few
differences. The first difference is the configuration on line 2. The
master: 1 0 1 ab and the slave: 1 1 1 ab. What does the second number stand
for? I can't find it in the documentation. Is this causing the difference
betwee
I did some other tests, and the fix for this problem seems to be to delete
the records for the domain in the cryptokeys table on the slave servers, and
after that update the serial.
Is there a way to force this using the pdnssec or pdns_control tools from
the master server?
Regards,
Marc
--
Vi
Hello!
My ISP is running a slave DNS service, using PowerDNS 3.0 as this is the
version included in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I've already read this post, about
DNSSEC in 3.0 being "explicitly deprecated":
http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2012-July/009099.html
But seeing that my ISP's po
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:49:39AM +0200, Fredrik Roubert wrote:
> But what does it mean? What exactly is it in my configuration that makes
> PowerDNS 3.0 unable to handle it? Is it something I could change to make
> PowerDNS 3.0 play along as a slave server?
No, sorry. And in general, if you are
Hello Frederik,
On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:49 , Fredrik Roubert wrote:
> My ISP is running a slave DNS service, using PowerDNS 3.0 as this is the
> version included in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I've already read this post, about
> DNSSEC in 3.0 being "explicitly deprecated":
>
> http://mailman.powerdn
I wonder why there are cryptokeys in the slave at all. What kind of
setup do you use? Online-signing on the master and pre-signed on the slaves?
klaus
On 25.09.2013 09:53, mvdgeijn wrote:
I did some other tests, and the fix for this problem seems to be to delete
the records for the domain in t
On both the master and slave servers "pdnssec show-zone" shows that the zone
is not pre-signed.
Regards,
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://powerdns.13854.n7.nabble.com/Different-RRSIG-s-on-master-and-slaves-tp10349p10362.html
Sent from the PowerDNS mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:49:39 +0200, Fredrik Roubert wrote:
> My ISP is running a slave DNS service, using PowerDNS 3.0 as this is the
> version included in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I've already read this post, about
> DNSSEC in 3.0 being "explicitly deprecated":
>
> http://mailman.powerdns.com/piper
Fredrik Roubert wrote:
> My ISP is running a slave DNS service, using PowerDNS 3.0 as this is the
> version included in Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I've already read this post, about
> DNSSEC in 3.0 being "explicitly deprecated":
>
> http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2012-July/009099.ht
On Wed 25 Sep 11:00 CEST 2013, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> If that's not it, check your zone file for any lines containing TYPE in
> uppercase, or any entry over 255 in
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml#dns-parameters-4
Ah, thank you, this is interesting. My zone f
Hello Fredrik,
On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:46 , Fredrik Roubert wrote:
> On Wed 25 Sep 11:00 CEST 2013, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
>> If that's not it, check your zone file for any lines containing TYPE in
>> uppercase, or any entry over 255 in
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parame
11 matches
Mail list logo
