Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS does not send info for reverse DNS

2014-09-26 Thread abang
Realy strange. Ok let's try step by step. Does your authoritative DNS Server work? Log-in into your DNS Server and dig -p 5300 @127.0.0.1 -x 10.20.0.4 dig -p 5300 @127.0.0.1 -x 10.20.1.4 dig -p 5300 @127.0.0.1 -x 10.20.2.4 And please provide the whole output. If this works, test your Recursor.

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS does not send info for reverse DNS

2014-09-26 Thread Bart-Jan van Hummel
> Maybe you didn't stopped it before you restarted? In this case config changes > didn't apply to the (running) Recursor. Well I just did a service pdns-recursor restart So I did some more testing and I found something else: it doesn't change my problem, but it does make the problem worse ;

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS does not send info for reverse DNS

2014-09-26 Thread abang
Am 26.09.2014 09:38, schrieb Bart-Jan van Hummel: > I don't know why he gives that resonse, since only pdns-recursor is > using port 53 on UDP/TCP: > > ~ root# netstat -tulpn | grep 10.20.0.4:53 > tcp0 0 10.20.0.4:530.0.0.0:* > LISTEN 3134/pdns_recursor >

[Pdns-users] Bash Code Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2014-6271)

2014-09-26 Thread Ravindra Bagul
Hello All, Please upgrade BASH. yum clean all yun install bash https://access.redhat.com/announcements/1210053 Thanks, Ravi. ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS does not send info for reverse DNS

2014-09-26 Thread Bart-Jan van Hummel
From: "abang" To: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2014 7:36:13 AM Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS does not send info for reverse DNS Hi Winfried > Hi, >>Exception: Resolver binding to server socket on port 53 for 10.20.0.4: >>Address already in use > Please

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS does not send info for reverse DNS

2014-09-26 Thread Bart-Jan van Hummel
Hi Peter, Sent: Thursday, 25 September, 2014 4:33:43 PM > A quick response to just this part: you can set dont-query to empty to avoid > this. Let us know if it helps! Unfortunately it didn't change anything. I am also tailing the syslog but it seems the reverse query for 10.20.0.2 does