Re: [Pdns-users] pdns_recursor - SERVFAIL resolving protection.outlook.com domains

Hi, I can confirm this work around works: It looks like there is a bug in the DNSSEC implementation. I can resolve this name on the current master branch with the `dnssec=off` setting. If it helps, I also came across the same issue when resolving names on secureserver.net - specifically

Re: [Pdns-users] Long DKIM entries.

Hi, IIRC, mine is 64k. Cheers, Tom. On 16 May 2016 16:23:27 CEST, Thorvald Hallvardsson wrote: >Hi, > >At the moment the content field in my database is varchar(255) so I >will >have to change that first and test it. > >Thank you for your response and help!

Re: [Pdns-users] Long DKIM entries.

Hi, At the moment the content field in my database is varchar(255) so I will have to change that first and test it. Thank you for your response and help! Regards, TH On 16 May 2016 at 14:55, Thomas Hager wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 14:29 +0100, Thorvald Hallvardsson

Re: [Pdns-users] Long DKIM entries.

On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 14:29 +0100, Thorvald Hallvardsson wrote: > Hi guys, Hi Thorvald, > Can someone let me know correct way of configure entries in PowerDNS > database to get them work for the domain keys which are quite long > and exceeds 255 characters ? Just store it in the database as a

[Pdns-users] Long DKIM entries.

Hi guys, Can someone let me know correct way of configure entries in PowerDNS database to get them work for the domain keys which are quite long and exceeds 255 characters ? In theory I should just be able to do something like: seaparator._domainkey.domainame.com IN TXT "v=dkim1; k=rsa; p=long

Re: [Pdns-users] why self-notification?

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 04:25:08AM -0700, geohei wrote: > Yes, 3.3. > But "prevent-self-notification=yes" still triggers self notifications. > Why were they implemented at a first place? It goes like this. A nameserver figures out who claims to be authoritative for a domain, and then gathers the

Re: [Pdns-users] why self-notification?

Yes, 3.3. But "prevent-self-notification=yes" still triggers self notifications. Why were they implemented at a first place? I don't see the usefullness. -- View this message in context: http://powerdns.13854.n7.nabble.com/why-self-notification-tp12287p12289.html Sent from the PowerDNS mailing

[Pdns-users] why self-notification?

Hi. PowerDNS newbie question (sorry). syslog shows (anonymized): May 15 19:51:46 gany pdns[30950]: 1 domain for which we are master needs notifications May 15 19:51:46 gany pdns[30950]: Queued notification of domain 'ddns.mydomain.com' to 185.3.195.46 May 15 19:51:46 gany pdns[30950]: Remote