Re: [Pdns-users] why self-notification?

Hi. I read your link about publishing real FQDNs an IPs, however I'm very reluctant to this ... I explain ... I'm not the super pro (as you noticed already) in this subject and I don't really know about the full range of potential consequences. I see already now some AXFR attempts from IPs from

[Pdns-users] Wildcard records with recursor.

I have pdns 3.4.7, and recursor 3.7.3 recursor.conf is: local-address=127.0.0.1 local-port=5300 log-common-errors=yes quiet=yes setgid=pdns setuid=pdns trace=off pdns.conf: daemon=yes guardian=yes include-dir=/etc/powerdns/pdns.d launch= local-address=0.0.0.0 setgid=pdns

Re: [Pdns-users] Trying to migrate form bind9

On 18/05/2016 11:41, @lbertosolorzano wrote: in the company are very strict confidentiality of the data and the data Protection Act so I find it impossible to extract real data. If you can keep trimming down your config to a point where it still fails, but contains no confidential data, that

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-server 4.0.0 alpha2 mysql query errors

On 18/05/2016 11:20, Pieter Lexis wrote: Yes you could, pdnsutil just talks to the database. What features from pdnsutil do you need that are not in the 3.4.9's pdnssec? If you create a ticket on github[1] about these, we might backport these functions. I just like the CLI for creating zones

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-server 4.0.0 alpha2 mysql query errors

Hi Brian, On Wed, 18 May 2016 10:53:27 +0100 Brian Candler wrote: > Supplementary question: could I take pdnsutil out of 4.0.0 and run it > with 3.4.9 ? Does it only talk to the database and do nothing else? Yes you could, pdnsutil just talks to the database. What

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-server 4.0.0 alpha2 mysql query errors

On 17/05/2016 10:41, Pieter Lexis wrote: >2. Has there been any mysql schema change between 3.4.8 and 4.0.0? That >is, can I just point 3.4.8 at the schema which I already installed? Yes, 4.0.0 will use prepared statements instead of string expansion for queries. Your specific issue is fixed

Re: [Pdns-users] Trying to migrate form bind9

Alberto, I spent 5 minutes copy pasting and setting up directories getting this to work. You also did not supply the other included files like .options, .local and .default-zones, so perhaps there is a problem in there I can't see. Please understand that if you want free help from a free

Re: [Pdns-users] Trying to migrate form bind9

*Hi Bert, ***/This are the congituration files, they're on production from 4 years ago with bind9 without problems and the named-checkconf and named-checkzone works correctly. (For confidentiality, names w//ent replaced and cut 4 zones of 450)/* root@powerdns:/etc/bind# cat named.conf *// This

Re: [Pdns-users] Trying to migrate form bind9

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:51:58AM +0200, @lbertosolorzano wrote: > Hi, > > At work are thinking to migrate our nsX servers to PowerDNS from bind, > all its ok, but when we went to use zone2sql show this error: Hi Alberto, Can you make an exact set of files that fails? So an named.conf & the

Re: [Pdns-users] Support for GSS-TSIG (RFC 3645) in PDNS 4.x

Hello Dharmesh, I have updated the compliance page. Thank you for letting us know. Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ On 18 May 2016, at 10:41, Dharmesh wrote: Hello Peter, Yes RFC3755 was obsoleted by 4033/4034/4035 but as per the details given on

Re: [Pdns-users] Support for GSS-TSIG (RFC 3645) in PDNS 4.x

Hello Peter, Yes RFC3755 was obsoleted by 4033/4034/4035 but as per the details given on https://www.powerdns.com/compliance.html this page, RFC4033 is not in the compliance list of PDNS. Since RFC4033,34,35 together makes a family of RPC's so what exactly is not compliant in RFC 4033 or is it

Re: [Pdns-users] Question on Recursion

Hello Chris, On 13 May 2016, at 15:23, Chris Fokkenrood wrote: At the moment we are running a test with powerdns v3, but cannot get this version to behave the way we want it to. The idea is to overwrite some subdomains of our (dns is externally hosted) own domain to local server

Re: [Pdns-users] Support for GSS-TSIG (RFC 3645) in PDNS 4.x

Hello Dharmesh, On 10 May 2016, at 11:07, Dharmesh wrote: Also DDNS and DNSSEC is fully supported in PDNS 4.x but i am not able to get the details of Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer (DS) support via documentation. Is the same supported by PDNS 4.x RFC3755 was obsoleted