Re: [Pdns-users] Best Front End admin for powerdns

2019-10-30 Thread Markus Ehrlicher
https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/wiki/WebFrontends I’m using PowerDNS-Admin and happy with this product. Best regards, Markus Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag von Elias Zerai Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Oktober 2019 14:49 An: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com Betreff: [Pdns-users] Best Front End admin for

[Pdns-users] Best Front End admin for powerdns

2019-10-30 Thread Elias Zerai
Dear All, I am searching for web front end admin to manage powerdns, please inform me best web admin for powerdns. Thank you in advance. -- - Elias. ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com https://mailman.powerdns.c

[Pdns-users] dnsdist 1.4.0-rc5 released

2019-10-30 Thread Remi Gacogne
Hello everyone, We are happy to announce the fifth release candidate of the 1.4.0 version of dnsdist. This release fixes a regression introduced in DNS over HTTPS handling in 1.4.0-rc4 that could lead to a crash under heavy load, because of a race condition. The issue was reported during load-tes

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS authoritative server UDP port?

2019-10-30 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:33:29PM -0600, Aaron D. Gifford wrote: > On a FreeBSD system running PowerDNS authoritative server 4.2.0, I noticed > this: > > # sockstat -4 > USER COMMANDPID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS > > root pdns_serve 40055 4 udp4 192.168.50.

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS authoritative server UDP port?

2019-10-30 Thread Brian Candler
On 30/10/2019 02:33, Aaron D. Gifford wrote: On a FreeBSD system running PowerDNS authoritative server 4.2.0, I noticed this: # sockstat -4 USER     COMMAND    PID   FD PROTO  LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root     pdns_serve 40055 4  udp4 192.168.50.12:53     *:* roo

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS authoritative server UDP port?

2019-10-30 Thread bert hubert
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 08:33:29PM -0600, Aaron D. Gifford wrote: > root pdns_serve 40055 16 udp4 192.168.50.12:19413 *:* > ... > > Why is it listening on UDP port 19413? I thought I'd disabled various > subsystems that might want to listen on a TCP or UDP port. This is likely the DNS pro