On 23/06/2020 19:47, Yves Goergen wrote:
Okay, so I'll have to repeat all the domains from the auth server's
database in a static config file? What's the use of the database then?
Well, if your authoritative server has a public IP address, then you can
just put NS records in the parent zone -
Okay, so I'll have to repeat all the domains from the auth server's
database in a static config file? What's the use of the database then?
And then I still have two DNS servers: one that can resolve any public
name, and another one that can resolve the names I host myself. The
recursor is only
On 23/06/2020 19:45, Brian Candler via Pdns-users wrote:
On 23/06/2020 19:38, Juraj Lutter wrote:
While we’re at it: How would one solve the situation where the
domains are in, like, SQL?
Well, I'd probably just run a cronjob to do a SQL query and write them
out periodically.
But I've
not
On 23/06/2020 19:38, Juraj Lutter wrote:
While we’re at it: How would one solve the situation where the domains are in,
like, SQL?
Well, I'd probably just run a cronjob to do a SQL query and write them
out periodically.
But I've come across a situation where I would need to do this. Regular
> On 23 Jun 2020, at 20:25, Brian Candler via Pdns-users
> wrote:
>
> On 23/06/2020 19:07, Yves Goergen via Pdns-users wrote:
>> I have only one server and one IPv4 address, so using a multi-IP setup just
>> isn't possible. With the decreased availability of IPv4 addresses, this
>> isn't real
On 23/06/2020 19:07, Yves Goergen via Pdns-users wrote:
I have only one server and one IPv4 address, so using a multi-IP setup
just isn't possible. With the decreased availability of IPv4
addresses, this isn't realistic either.
It's not a problem: your recursor can be behind NAT on a private I
Hello,
I'm preparting the upgrade from an old server to current software. One
of the changes is that PowerDNS Auth and Recursor are upgraded from
4.0.9 to 4.2.1 from Ubuntu 20.04. While checking my old config files, I
was surprised to find that the documentation just silently says the
recurso
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:28:38AM +0200, Michael Rommel wrote:
> Hi Otto,
>
> thanks for the pointer! AFAICT it covers my patches as well, looks a lot more
> complicated, though. I'll take a closer look at it.
>
> Is there any reason, why it hasn't been merged yet? Any cases that would
> brea
