Hi Sebastian!
The term "cached data" usually does not refer to the data in the database, but
to data cached in the PDNS process (packet cache, query cache).
If you want to clean the "cache" the fastest method is to restart the PDNS
process (a short service interruption). To adjust caching
> Why not do something along the lines of (PostgreSQL syntax as that's
> what I know, and completely untested):
>
> INSERT INTO records (domain_id, name, type, content, ttl)
>SELECT domain.id, 'autoconfig.' || domains.name, 'CNAME, ' zone>, 3600
>FROM domains
>JOIN records ON
I have never used pdnsutil. Maybe the domain is created with type NATIVE
instead of MASTER. Check the 'domains' table.
Klaus
Gesendet über BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
Von: Pdns-users im Namen von Andres
Alejandro Dobie via Pdns-users
Gesendet:
You can do this in PowerDNS Authoritative using LUA records, see:
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/lua-records/
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Pdns-users Im
> Auftrag von Riccardo Brunetti via Pdns-users
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. September 2023 18:43
> An:
tiple PDNS processes writing
into a single DB you can configure your HA manager to start PDNS only once the
floating IP is migrated to the standby server.
regards
Klaus
--
Klaus Darilion, Head of Operations
nic.at GmbH, Jakob-Haringer-Straße 8/V
5020 Salzburg, Austria
> -Ursprüngli
Configure pdns to listen to the floating IP and set net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind.
Klaus
Gesendet über BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
Von: Pdns-users im Namen von lejeczek
via Pdns-users
Gesendet: 28.07.2023 06:05
An: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Cc:
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: William Edwards
> Gesendet: Samstag, 15. April 2023 23:51
> An: Peter Thomassen
> Cc: Klaus Darilion ; pdns-
> us...@mailman.powerdns.com
> Betreff: Re: [Pdns-users] IXFR Stability Feedback
>
>
> > Op 15 apr. 2023 o
Hi!
We have a customer zone with ~1.1 mio RRs (~200K NSEC3 RRs) with zone updates
every few minutes. We use the Postgresql backend and replicate the zone to the
secondaries using logical replication. It is not very smart pushing out 5GB of
(almost same) data every few minutes, and it is
it
manually?
Thanks
Klaus
--
Klaus Darilion, Head of Operations
nic.at GmbH, Jakob-Haringer-Straße 8/V
5020 Salzburg, Austria
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
PDNS sends only NOTIFYs for SLAVE zones is slave-renotify is turned on
(globally, or per zone in domainmetadata table).
So, if your SLAVEs shoudl not send NOTIFYs make sure to disable slave-renotify.
If a PDNS instance slaves zones from a master, but also acts as master to other
slaves, then
.
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Alexis Fidalgo
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Februar 2023 16:02
> An: Klaus Darilion
> Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
> Betreff: Re: [Pdns-users] ENUM NAPTR queries
>
> No worries, I’m working now in a combination
Probably things are different when using a dynamic backend vs. a DB backend.
Unfortunately I am not familiar with the remote backend.
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Alexis Fidalgo
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Februar 2023 15:20
> An: Klaus Darilion
>
disabled the zone-cache, using an old
PowerDNs version, or this feature is not supported with MongoDB.
regards
Klaus
--
Klaus Darilion, Head of Operations
nic.at GmbH, Jakob-Haringer-Straße 8/V
5020 Salzburg, Austria
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag von
&g
Hello!
We regularly use "pdns_control retrieve" (via TCP) to trigger zone transfers.
Very often we receive:
Timeout error: Error from remote in receive(): Resource temporarily unavailable
Our PDNS is quite busy, plenty of NOTIFYs, SLAVE checks and incoming AXFRs.
What exactly happens when
Hi Tomas!
I can not speak about INCEPTION-INCREMENT. But I remember when we had to
decide which increment-method to choose we have chosen INCREMENT-WEEKS because
it is the only method that works always - regardless of the serial format
chosen by the zone editor. With INCREMENT-WEEKS the
In old dnsdist versions the chache was per "cookie". So make sure to test with
DNS cookies.
regards
Klaus
Von: dnsdist Im Auftrag von Jacob Bunk
Nielsen via dnsdist
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Juli 2022 12:28
An: dnsd...@mailman.powerdns.com
Betreff: Re: [dnsdist] Dnsdist not reading from the cache
Hi Dmitriy!
Recently we had a similar requirement for our resolvers (which only do query
logging, not response logging) and we decided to use packetbeat for this
purpose. IT should be easy to integrate if you have an existing Elasic Search
cluster!
regards
Klaus
Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag
https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/10150
Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag von Klaus
Darilion via Pdns-users
Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Mai 2022 06:35
An: j...@elsif.net; pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Betreff: Re: [Pdns-users] Question about DNSSEC + ALIAS (cname at the apex hack)
Alias does
Alias does not support dnssec. See issues on github. Klaus
Gesendet über BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
Von: Pdns-users im Namen von Jake via
Pdns-users
Gesendet: 30.05.2022 22:10
An: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Betreff: [Pdns-users] Question about
Hi Jake!
This answers are probably worth some for consulting. Anyways...
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Pdns-users Im
...
> Does PowerDNS load all of the zones into memory, and then start serving
> (like BIND), or does it load each zone and start serving said zone
> immediately
ove the root zone from your POwerDNS.
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Marijn
> Gesendet: Freitag, 22. April 2022 19:18
> An: Klaus Darilion ; pdns-
> us...@mailman.powerdns.com
> Betreff: Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC and CNAME records results NXDOMAIN
>
ns1.mijn.host hostmaster.@ 0 10800 3600 604800 3600
>
> Klaus Darilion schreef op 2022-04-22 18:06:
> > I do not see any difference of the two cases. But in any case,
> > returning an answer AND nxdomain is just broken.
> >
> >
> > # dig @ns1.mijn.host. autodisco
I do not see any difference of the two cases. But in any case, returning an
answer AND nxdomain is just broken.
# dig @ns1.mijn.host. autodiscover.egogo.eu
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 62514
...
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;autodiscover.egogo.eu. IN A
;; ANSWER
Hi! Last time I build PDNS myself was 4.0. I just wanted to build packages for
master, but found out that the build-auth-debian script has gone.
What is the new way to build Debian packages?
Thanks
Klaus
___
Pdns-users mailing list
PowerDNS signature validity is always 3 weeks. Start is the second last
Thursday 00:00 UTC, end is the next but one Thursday 00:00.
Start
End
Thursday Thursday Today Thursday
IIRC you are right. But there were several updatest o the zone cache after
release. If you use 4.5 make sure to use latest 4.5.x version. regards
Klaus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lucas Rolff
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2022 16:58
An: Klaus Darilion
Cc: Andrea Biscuola ; Pdns
Have you really disabled all caches? Also
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/settings.html#zone-cache-refresh-interval
?
regards
Klaus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag von Andrea
Biscuola via Pdns-users
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Februar 2022 15:12
An:
Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag von Klaus
Darilion via Pdns-users
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Februar 2022 09:58
An: Riccardo Brunetti ;
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Betreff: Re: [Pdns-users] powerdns frequently crashes and restarts
Look in the mysql-server log. Maybe it mentions which other transact
Look in the mysql-server log. Maybe it mentions which other transaction causes
the deadlock. That my help to find the cause.
Is this problem something new? I.e. started it after a PDNs or Mysql Upgrade?
regards
Klaus
Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag von
Riccardo Brunetti via Pdns-users
Gesendet:
No.
This is a known issue.
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/settings.html#send-signed-notify
regards
Klaus
Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag von Stefan
Becker via Pdns-users
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Februar 2022 14:36
An: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Betreff: [Pdns-users] TSIG-Keys for
> This would normally be fine, but the change seems to occur only in the
> service itself and is not reflected in the SOA record stored in the
> database.
SOA-Edit does not influence/manipulate the serial in the DB.
SOA-EDIT is used to fake the Serial (on outgoing NOTIFYs and responses which
Hi! During random subdomain attacks we often hit the max-queue-length:
pdns_server-customer1[51284]: 5001 questions waiting for database/backend
attention. Limit is 5000, respawning
This happens constantly (+50K q/s). Of course we try to filter with
dnsdist/iptables/... but until our detection
Hi Daniel!
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Daniel Stirnimann
> Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2021 11:27
> An: Klaus Darilion ; Pdns-
> us...@mailman.powerdns.com
> Betreff: Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC Algorithm Rollover Documentation
>
> Hello Klaus,
>
> The DNS
Hi Daniel!
Thanks for the info.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Daniel Stirnimann
> Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2021 11:27
> An: Klaus Darilion ; Pdns-
> us...@mailman.powerdns.com
> Betreff: Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC Algorithm Rollover Documentation
>
> Hell
Hi all!
Does the Bind backend support journaling and incoming/outgoing IXFR (as similar
to Bind)?
Thanks
Klaus
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Hi all!
Is there somewhere documentation for an algorithm rollover?
The cryptokeys table recently received the "published" column to "Implement
published and unpublished dnskeys to allow algorith rollovers.":
So you want probably Bind's stale-answer-enable=yes?
Klaus
Gesendet über BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
Von: Mike via Pdns-users
Gesendet: 27.05.2020 22:33
An: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Betreff: [Pdns-users] retaining cache
Hi,
I already know
> A notable new feature in 4.3 is support for hiding DNSSEC keys, which makes
> it possible to do algorithm rollovers. This feature was contributed by Robin
> Geuze of TransIP, thanks!
Can someone please provide link to a bug report/pull request/ir similar?
I want to understand why algorithm
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Pdns-users Im Auftrag
> von Erik Winkels via Pdns-users
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. April 2020 12:45
> An: pdns-annou...@mailman.powerdns.com; pdns-
> d...@mailman.powerdns.com; pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
> Betreff: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS
There is an issue on github about this. You are correct, pdns just uses the
first tsig key returned by the backend. The workaround was a config option to
disable signed notifications.
Klaus
Gesendet über BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
Von: Matthew Monaco
DNS Master/Slave was not designed for dynamic IP addresses. As a workaround you
could use some overlay whoch provides a static IP (OpenVPN, stunnel, ssh
tunnels, ...)
Regards
Klaus
Gesendet über BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
Von: Matthew Monaco via
tweak the domainmetadata, ie. for serial bumping. Also make
sure that there are no zone changes while doing above process.
regards
Klaus
Am 13.02.2020 um 12:59 schrieb Klaus Darilion via Pdns-users:
Hello!
I have thousands of DNSSEC presigned-signed zones which I slave with
PowerDNS (type
Hello!
I have thousands of DNSSEC presigned-signed zones which I slave with PowerDNS
(type='SLAVE'). I want to move all these zones to PowerDNS as type='MASTER'.
Basically this should be very simple:
For each zone:
BEGIN;
UPDATE domains SET type='MASTER' where id=XXX;
INSERT INTO cryptokeys
Am 15.01.2020 um 19:21 schrieb Matthias Kruzenski:
Hello,
I want to use PowerDNS to answer NAPTR queries through the pipe backend.
This works, but PowerDNS does not pass a NAPTR request to the backend,
but always a SOA request and then an ANY request.
I only want to pass what was explicitly
Am 02.12.2019 um 15:58 schrieb Erik Winkels via Pdns-users:
Please send us all feedback and issues you might have via the mailing list[4],
or in case of a bug, via GitHub[5].
From [1]
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/changelog/4.2.html#change-4.2.1
Improvements
Register a few known
Hi all!
I just recently found the "domain-metadata-cache-ttl" option. Reviewing
the code it seems that this cache is only used for DNSSEC related data
during handling of incoming queries. Is this correct? (it should be
added to the docs).
Further I wonder if it may be useful to change the
Am 27.09.2019 um 20:30 schrieb Vitali Quiering via Pdns-users:
Hello,
I just started using PowerDNS Authoritative Server recently and got to the
point where I need all changes logged.
Is there an option I missed?
If there is none: How do you log your changes?
We have a web interface which
Am 24.09.2019 um 17:00 schrieb jb-wisemo via Pdns-users:
On 24/09/2019 14:25, Pieter Lexis wrote:
Hi Jakob,
On 9/24/19 12:31 AM, jb-wisemo via Pdns-users wrote:
I am creating a custom master-mode backend for a special use. But some
questions are left open or vague by the documentation, here
Am 18.09.2019 um 13:55 schrieb Pieter Lexis:
On 9/18/19 1:55 PM, Pieter Lexis wrote:
This is a bug, there is a PR to fix this[1], but this PR has to be
un-conflicted and re-reviewed.
I have the patch rebased for 4.1, but not yet for 4.2.
BUt in this case, it would even be better to not check
I think, first you should find out if there is a problem with PowerDNS
or the network - or inbetween.
If this happens regularly, just use tcpdump to caputre all DNS traffic
to a file (rotate files, keep only X files and choose X to not fill your
complete hard disk).
Or even simpler - just
Hi!
I wonder how the SOA-EDIT feature (to keep signatures fresh on slaves)
works in detail:
- Will the master also send NOTIFYs with increased serials to keep the
slave fresh, or does it rely that the refresh value is small and the
slave checks for newer serials on the master?
- SOA-EDIT
Hi Bart!
Am 30.04.2019 um 16:31 schrieb power...@bart.bim.be:
In the normal case, suppressing responses may be a good thing to do,
if the actual problem is that the DNS responses are part of a DoS
attack (i.e. the DNS queries came in with spoofed source addresses).
The responses cause your
Hi Brian!
Am 30.04.2019 um 15:37 schrieb Brian Candler:
On 29/04/2019 22:14, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Can you give an example how those dynblockrules can be used to filter
above "attack"? The main problem with rate-limiting NXDOMAIN is, that
you need to ask the authoritative to get
Hi Nico!
Am 26.04.2019 um 15:05 schrieb Nico CARTRON:
Hi Markus,
On 26-Apr-2019 14:55 CEST, wrote:
Hello together,
since recently we use two powerDNS Authoritative Servers (v.4.1.8) for
managing our own domains. Is it possible, to rate-limit dns lookups for
non-existing Domains?
Hi!
If a zone is presigned, and PowerDNS is a slave (AXFR), will PowerDNS
support all DNSSEC algorithms, or is there some limitiations that only
allows the native supported algorithms [1].
Thanks
Klaus
[1] https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/dnssec/profile.html
I recommend other tools, eg:
ldns-verify-zone
and
named-checkzone, named-compilezone
PowerDNS is not very strict. It happens quite easily that a zone loaded
and served by PowerDNS can not tranfered by a Bind slave. Hence, I
recommend the tools from Bind to verify a zone.
regards
Klaus
Am
The answer is quite simple - multi master support in PDNS is only
available in the docs ;-)
https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/pull/5595
regards
Klaus
Am 15.12.2018 um 07:29 schrieb Don Stokes:
Hi all,
I'm looking to deploy PowerDNS in a slave configuration that has
multiple (BIND) masters.
Sounds like allow-unsigned-update,
similar to
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/settings.html#allow-unsigned-notify
would be needed
Klaus
Am 02.01.2019 um 02:15 schrieb Kevin P. Fleming:
I've got PowerDNS Auth happily running and serving a number of domains
(primary and two
> - Apply alias scopemask after chasing
Can you please describe what the scopemask is about? The patch and also
the issue does not contain any documentation.
Thanks
Klaus
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Am 04.10.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Rodrigo Severo - Fábrica:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand the role fulfilled by each column in the SQL
backends.
I have already read this page:
https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/backends/generic-sql.html#queries
but can't find any info on the "ordername"
Am 24.07.2018 um 13:54 schrieb Martijn Reening:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We are seeing very vague issues with our PowerDNS setup where certain
> sequences of requests can cause full queues and dropped queries. Under
> normal circumstances, the server can handle more than 10 kqueries/sec,
> but
Am 10.07.2018 um 08:04 schrieb Scott Colby:
- a script running on ns1 that checks if the ALIAS has changed and forces a
NOTIFY to be sent (is this possible via the PowerDNS API?)
Sending a NOTIFY is not sufficient. You also have to increase the serial
before sending NOTIFY to make sure
Which backend do you use? If sql, have you set the type in the domains
table to "MASTER"?
regards
Klaus
Am 27.06.2018 um 17:49 schrieb Walter Parker:
> I have my system setup as follows:
>
> master=yes
> allow-axfr-ips=216.128.133.2 208.94.147.124 208.94.147.125 208.94.147.135
> 208.94.150.198
Am 29.06.2018 um 23:23 schrieb Anthony Eden:
Hello everyone,
I am considering moving some or all of DNSimple's authoritative DNS service
back over to PowerDNS within the next 6 months, but before I do so, I'm hoping
to get in touch with one or more folks from the PowerDNS community who
Am 21.06.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Eric Raymond:
We have two servers that manage our external zones,
ServerA is set to Native using gmysql backend and sits in an internal
network, and replicates to ServerB in our DMZ. We also would like to
have a AXFR sent to notify our external DNS provider,
Am 11.06.2018 um 12:53 schrieb Klaus Darilion:
> Hi!
>
> We soon put ALIAS into production. Hence, I have some questions to
> better understand what's going on internally in PDNS.
>
> a) What happens if the backend query (from PDNS-auth to resolver) is
> unanswer
Hi!
We soon put ALIAS into production. Hence, I have some questions to
better understand what's going on internally in PDNS.
a) What happens if the backend query (from PDNS-auth to resolver) is
unanswered? Will PDNS timeout the outstanding query or will it be kept
on the list for ever? If it
Am 08.05.2018 um 14:02 schrieb Peter van Dijk:
* add tcp support for alias
I have a question - the respective pull request mentions "resolve via
stub resolver". Does this mean it uses the name servers configured in
/etc/resolv.conf, or does it also use the resolver=... setting?
Thanks
Klaus
Am 15.03.2018 um 12:44 schrieb Marco Pizzoli:
> - create a zone for every specific DNS entry I am "mangling": I understand
> ALIAS works only for zone apex entries...
No, it works for all lables.
regards
Klaus
___
Pdns-users mailing list
What about the "ALIAS" record in PowerDNS? Then the authoritative PDNS
will use the configured resolver, which may be able to resolve the
second domain.
regards
Klaus
Am 26.02.2018 um 18:41 schrieb Marco Pizzoli:
> Hi Aleksandr,
> thanks for the prompt answer, but unfortunately no...
> The
Am 17.01.2018 um 11:31 schrieb Steve Zeng:
> I came across this post and was concerned if the high number of NOTIFY/AXFR
> overloaded PowerDNS, given that we have ~6,000 zones and ~100 BIND slaves. Do
> you know if there is a built-in limit on the AXFR volume?
Probably not the number of
nfigured master to
> check the serial? Is it immediately right after it get NOTIFY from master?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>> On Jan 17, 2018, at 3:32 PM, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 17.01.2018 um 15:13 schri
Am 17.01.2018 um 15:13 schrieb Steve Zeng:
> Pieter,
>
> I checked BIND slaves logs around the time frame and found:
>
> 10-Jan-2018 18:11:17.211 notify: client 10.198.180.41#12149: received notify
> for zone 'example.com'
> 10-Jan-2018 18:11:17.211 general: zone lhr4.dqs.booking.com/IN:
Am 06.01.2018 um 17:18 schrieb Michael Ströder:
> bert hubert wrote:
>> We have done some very tentative measurements on the Linux Meltdown
>> workaround & impact on DNS performance.
>
> Besides the performance impact of the "fixes" doesn't this mean that
> people should stop doing DNSSEC
Hi!
We use the PowerDNS Auth control socket with TCP from another host
extensivly to trigger "retrieve" requests. Several times a day we get
the follwing error:
# pdns_control --remote-address=... --remote-port=... --secret=...
retrieve example.com
Timeout error: Error from remote in receive():
Hi!
I do not understand in detail what you are trying to achieve. But when
using multiple backends, the answer is still coming only from one
backend - the one with the best matching zone.
e.g. backend 1 hosts test.test and backend 2 hosts test.test.test.
If there is a query for
Am 28.12.2017 um 21:56 schrieb Jivko Sabev:
Greetings everyone,
After a long haitus, the JPowerAdmin control panel has a new release.
You can find the details at the following link:
https://www.jpoweradmin.ca/
From your website:
Key features
...
» MBOXFW record support (email forwarding)
1.2017 17:01, Brian Candler wrote:
>> On 07/11/2017 14:57, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>> But whatever I try I do not receive a core dump.
>>
>> Not answering your question directly, but what about running pdns
>> directly under
isk space, write permissions, ulimit ... no core dump.
I do not even see the added log message, nor any kernel logging about
the aborted process.
Do you have any ideas what I am doing wrong?
Thanks
Klaus
Am 25.10.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Remi Gacogne:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> On 10/2
Hi Peter!
I need help again debugging this issue. I used c++filt to beautify the
trace. I also added the log lines before -> see attachment.
I do not understand how the stacktrace correlates with the exception
error. I analyzed the stack trace and I do not see any access to a
DNSName at the top
imal writes to PDNS only via nsupdate.
> Is there any way to forward those requests to the writable instance or do I
> have to specify the right one in the nsupdate dialog?
>
> Best regards,
> Fabian
>
>> On 15. Oct 2017, at 21:00, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...
Am 07.10.2017 um 22:59 schrieb Fabian:
Hi,
I have some questions regarding the integration of PostgreSQL replication and
PowerDNS operating in native mode.
As the replication of Postgres is a master - slave replication the transactions
on the slaves are read-only.
- Is there a way to
Hi!
My PowerDNS 4.0.4 (with some modifications) exits often with
"Exiting because communicator thread died with STL error: Attempt to
print an unset dnsname"
I have some hard time to find where this happens. The logged stack trace is:
Sep 26 14:53:19 cc-reg-vie1 pdns[16802]:
Am 22.09.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
> To my inexpert eye it seems that in your original post, 4.1 was fastest
> of the lot, so the database begin/commit + prepare cannot really explain
> this since this has not been removed in 4.1?
Obviously there were some changes - no more BEGIN/COMMIT
Update: I do see that the BEGIN/COMMIT exists in 4.0, but was removed in
Master (4.1pre). That might explain why Master is faster :-)
regards
Klaus
Am 22.09.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Klaus Darilion:
>
>
> Am 21.09.2017 um 20:20 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
>> Statements are supposed t
Am 21.09.2017 um 20:20 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
> Statements are supposed to prepared once, not per every query.
Indeed, that is the case, the "prepare" is only done once.
But I see that simple SELECTs are wrapped into transactions. Maybe this
is also a performance penalty:
regards
Klaus
LOG:
Hi Bert!
Am 19.09.2017 um 21:18 schrieb bert hubert:
> Can you redo your measurements against 4.1rc1? We fixed a lot in there.
> Would be interesting to know if 4.1 is already better.
Targets: reg-tst1, reg-tst2. (they are identical: 4vCPUs, 8GB RAM, no
other VMs running on this hypervisor)
Am 20.09.2017 um 10:24 schrieb tbn:
> This query performs well in bind, so can anyone point if/what I'm
> doing wrong here ?
> Also, can anyone try to reproduce this behaviour ?
AFAIK this is correct behavior. See
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4592#section-2.2.1
Are you sure that Bind
Hi Nick!
I found this old thread. I am not familiar with galera, Percona etc. but
IMO the setup is to complex. Why do you use master-master replication
between the slaves? The slaves get synced from the master, hence every
slave can have its own DB, no clustering needed.
if both slaves receive
Hi!
Setup: PowerDNS with gqgsql backend, several 100.000 zones (type=NATIVE)
on a 4 CPU VM with 8GB Ram
cache-ttl=120
negquery-cache-ttl=120
query-cache-ttl=240
distributor-threads=8
receiver-threads=1
I am running 2 tests with dnsperf:
1. query the SOA of every authoritative zone: every zone
Hi Peter!
Thanks for the answers.
On 08.02.2017 18:53, Pieter Lexis wrote:
>> - If ALIAS is not enabled, will PDNS just ignore these records?
> ALIAS is always "enabled". When we encounter an ALIAS record for the name
> queried, it is expanded.
So, there is no means to disable ALIAS? Then this
Hi!
I wonder if there are any potential side effects if I enable ALIAS
support on my authoritative servers.
- Will outstanding recursion somehow block or slow down the answering of
normal ressource records?
- Will the expanded ALIAS result locally cached? (besides the packet
cache, e.g. based
Hi!
I hav some input for https://doc.powerdns.com/md/authoritative/performance/:
Just recently we did some performance debugging and found out that
plenty of CPU was wasted due to the default encryption between PDNS and
the Postgres DB. By disabling encryption we achieved around 30% more
q/s,
Hi!
What is the expected result if a zone is provisioned in 2 active
backends. eg: launch=bind,gpgsql
I know PDNS checks both backends for the best matching zone (getAuth).
But I would expect that if PDNS finds out that both backends provide the
zone, only the first configured backend is
Oh, sorry for my confusion.
Klaus
Am 03.01.2017 um 10:03 schrieb Pieter Lexis:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:37:09 +0100
> Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at> wrote:
>
>> https://repo.powerdns.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/pdns/ (and debian and
>
Hi!
https://repo.powerdns.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/pdns/ (and debian and
centos) only offers packages for 4.0.1, but not for 4.0.3. Is this on
purpose?
Thanks
Klaus
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Hi!
We use PDNS to fetch zone from our customer's master server and serve
then our our name server. The problem is, if a big customer's master
server is not available, PDNS is busy doing frehsness checks for the
respective domains (e.g. 20 domains). Thus will also cause problems
for
Hi Bert!
On 23.05.2016 10:02, bert hubert wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:51:38AM +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>> I am a bit confused about the source code on github. Which branch is the
>> current 3.x branch and which one is the upcoming 4.0 branch?
>
> Hi Klaus,
>
Hi!
I am a bit confused about the source code on github. Which branch is the
current 3.x branch and which one is the upcoming 4.0 branch?
Thanks
Klaus
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Hi!
I make some test to transfer zones from PDNS using TSIG. The strange
thing is, that AXFR + TSIG always works. But querying PDNS using TSIG
most of the time results in TSIG errors, e.g:
I query with:
dig @xx.xx.xx.x www.tld-box.com A -y test:TpCdBiXZ
successful query:
17:25:25 Query:
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo