Re: [Pdns-users] Hidden supermasters

2010-08-06 Thread Richard McLean
On 06/08/2010, at 3:54 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote: No, this is not a restriction. In our setup we've added the ip address in the supermasters-table like this: +---++--+ | ip| nameserver | account |

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS does not expire domains - propagates lame delegation.

2007-09-12 Thread Richard McLean
At 12:51 PM -0700 12/9/07, Augie Schwer wrote: Alternatively Bind seems to note the non-authoritative answer from its master and add the domain into a some list (neg. cache, etc.) and not answer authoritatively for it. Am I wrong in thinking this is a problem? No, I'd say it sounds like a

Re: [Pdns-users] CNAME/Wildcard problem - why you should care.

2007-08-02 Thread Richard McLean
Hi All, If you are concerned about this behavior then please make yourself known; because if I am the only one that thinks this is a problem then I certainly don't expect it to get fixed any time soon. Certainly sounds like a painful one with possibly serious side-effects for the domains

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS releases?

2007-02-25 Thread Richard McLean
At 4:38 PM +0100 25/2/07, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: Some time ago[1] I reported wrong behaviour of pdns regarding existing domains that have no resource records attached. Powerdns reports such domains as non-existing. At first the problem was denied, later it was difficult to fix and

[Pdns-users] Is it possible to un-resolve a domain?

2006-08-21 Thread Richard McLean
Hi All, Not sure if this is a wacky idea or not, but I was wondering if it's possible to add a domain to our DNS to make it NOT resolve? I know it's possible to set it to resolve to a bogus IP, but I'd like for it to give an NXDOMAIN rather than that. Is that possible? cheers, Richard