Sorry, wrong link. I mean
https://blog.powerdns.com/2016/01/18/open-source-support-out-in-the-open/
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 07:32:50PM +0100, Ruben d'Arco via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please share your dhcp configuration? It is likely that it has
> net.exampl
Hi,
Can you please share your dhcp configuration? It is likely that it has
net.example.com as the zone.
This means that it will send a update dns request for that zone and pdns would
look for this zone.
Please also read https://www.powerdns.com/opensource.html as i'm quite sure you
don't own t
Hi MRob,
The DNS Update specification (RFC2136) has a section that allows a DNS update
to do check (pre-requisites) before applying the update.
PDNS performs these checks, and it seems that the current records of your
domain do not comply with those pre-requisites.
Can you show us the records f
Hi,
I once had the idea of creating a redis backend, but couldn't fully decide on
the structure to use for that as i have no redis expirience :)
So, currently there is no Redis backend.
If you're interested in developing it, then maybe the pdns-dev mailling list is
a good option to share ideas
Thanks for the update! It makes sense. I've logged this as ticket 3528, so
somebody could have a look at that subzone query behaviour a bit better.
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 09:40:57PM +0100, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe you remember my message regarding suboptimal ddns update perform
Just a "fyi" i've expirienced the same behaviour a while ago.
That was on a Ubuntu 14.04LTS system. PDNS works fine after restarting, but i
haven't been able to reproduce the issue.
My config is like this:
allow-dnsupdate-from=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.0.100/32
any-to-tcp=yes
config-dir=/etc/powerdns
d
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:54:26AM -0600, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Thomas Mieslinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > today I wanted to migrate my ddns master from bind to pdns. 3 DHCP
> > Servers sent a about 50 updates per second to the pdns 3.4.8 and
> > only one o
Hi,
Can you maybe report this into a github issue, so it doesn't get forgotten?
Being one of the contributers that helped implement this, i really want to have
a
look and try the same scenario locally and if reproducable, fix it.
But my time is very limited at the moment. The chrismas holiday sh
l.
> In a separate installation I have a schema that holds additional
> information in the records table, and that information would be
> lost.
> Is there a reason for delete/insert instead of update?
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
> (2014年08月27日 22:20), Ruben d'Arco wrote
Hi Martin,
I've (with some help) fixed the bug.
I currently have the code here
https://github.com/cyclops1982/pdns/tree/tsigforward
Could you build and try that version and see if it works for you?
Regards,
Ruben
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:36:57AM +0200, Ruben d'Arco w
Hi Martin,
No worries. PDNS is not my work, just hobby so i have to squeeze it in between
all kinds of stuff :-)
I am able to reproduce the issue locally now, which is already wonderful as
that gives me options to debug it further.
When a update message is forwarded, the message ID is rewritte
> > Going back over versions, I see I am running BIND 9.9.5 instead of 9.3.
> > Maybe that's the problem?
> >
> > dhcpd is 4.2.4.
> >
> > I will send you the packet capture off-list,
> > as I am not sure if it is permissable to send attachments to
,
> as I am not sure if it is permissable to send attachments to the list...
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> (2014年08月22日 17:07), Ruben d'Arco wrote:
> >Hi Martin,
> >
> >I'm running virtually the same config but do not have this issue.
> >Woul
Hi Martin,
I'm running virtually the same config but do not have this issue.
Would it be possible for you to create a tcpdump/pcap file so i can replay the
message on my end?
Just to be sure, the tsigkeys table should have 'hmac-md5' as algoritm.
Could you also tell us what version of dhcpd you'
Hi Martin,
Could you provide some logging from powerdns?
It should note/show what's it doing on that end...
Regards,
Ruben
On 22 August 2014 04:40:57 CEST, Martin Chandler wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have been playing with the new dynamic dns feature of authoritative
>server 3.4.0-rc1, and have a ques
Am i the only one who finds this a little funny as It's always a dns
problem...
(and this also a test message :-)
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:59:51AM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Over the past few months, we'd been receiving some reports of people having
> problems posting t
Hi,
I do not have the same setup, but i would not know why this should not work.
Would you mind sharing your database content so i can try to identify the issue
and/or replicate the issue?
Regards,
Ruben
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Andreas Danzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm r
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:26:40AM +0530, Blason rock wrote:
> So assume i m setting up ddns using pdns. What ttl value would you
> recommend? 0 or 30.
>
> And do i need setup manually those ttl values or ddns client will
> automatically update the ttl value.
If you're using rfc2136, the TTL will
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:29:13PM +0200, a b wrote:
> > Allthough not in the main powerdns branch, there is this:
> > https://github.com/cyclops1982/powerdns/tree/rfc2136
> > It's a implementation for rfc2136 for powerdns. It's lacking some feedback,
> > so please test and report!
> > Also, it do
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:57:41PM +0200, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Blason rock wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
>
> Hello there,
>
> > I m planning to setup ddns server for my organization. We are specifically
> > setting this up for dvrs. Initially we used dyn dns but
The domains table on the slave has some administration fields. I'm not sure
which as I'm unable to check. Set that to NULL or an old value and pdns will
retrieve the zone again.
Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>
>On 10.04.2013 13:33, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>>> Is there a simple way for a secondary to fo
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:17:59AM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 5/4/2013 9:56 πμ, Ruben d'Arco wrote:
>
> >I believe that should solve your first two points, i suggest you provide a
> >bit more information (logging, configuration) in the other thread on the
>
Hi Nick,
To do some selective notifying, please see
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/454
For the notifications send to itself, this might help:
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/468
I believe that should solve your first two points, i suggest you provide a bit
more information (logging,
Hi,
This is by design and not specific to the ldap backend.
Powerdns simply receives the nameservers from the backend and starts resolving
the name to ip addresses.
If that name has multiple ip addresses (v6 or v4), notifies will be send to all
of them.
There is a ticket open for this and a pat
Hi,
This ia bit of a gues, but:
The AUTO-NS feature seems to use a normal getaddrinfo(). This might have a
different result than you expect on your system.
Can you check what's in your resolv.conf and see what that replied when you ask
for dns1.test.com and dns2.test.com?
Regards,
Ruben
Hi,
Another appraoch would be to run two instances of pdns. Every instance would
run on a specific ip which corresponds
to the subnet that you want to use. For internal/external scenario's this will
probably work.
The small downside of this is that you have to maintain two zones and two
powerd
Hi Luca,
Normally, the SOA-serial is what you set in your database. If you've never set
it, you might be using the auto-serial feature. It would be helpful if you
provide some information about your powerdns setup (config files, etc).
You can also simply change the SOA record in your database t
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 07:28:35PM -0500, James Cloos wrote:
> I've spent some time looking into a set of functions (I use pgsql) for
> making changes, which can do all of the necessary logic when adding,
> removing or changing an RR, but I haven't yet compiled a full list of
> what exactly is
Hi,
This should be helpful as a first start:
http://doc.powerdns.com/backend-writers-guide.html
Also have a look at the regression-test direcory, as it is quiet helpul for
testing your backend.
Regards,
Ruben
RBK1001 wrote:
>
>Hi
>
>we would like to seek for an advice on the use of back
Hi Zdeněk,
PowerDNS's supermaster/superslave functionality is only based on IP-address
security.
Securing that with TSIG is a good idea, but it is not in PowerDNS.
You can submit feature requests on http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac
The username/password is on the front page.
Kind regards,
> > We're planning to drop the pdns_control implementation and only keeping the
> > pdnssec implementation.
>
> I have not even started to study DNSSEC yet, so I have no idea what the
> implications of the above are. Anyone?
pdnssec is a wrongly/badly selected name for the tool. The plan is to
Sorry, small mistake in the e-mail:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:00:53AM +0100, Ruben d'Arco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Picking up on this older message, because this relates to the ticket #608.
>
> I've created a patch as a fix for #608. The patch can be found here:
> ht
ast_check field lower than the
given command.
My preference would be to move to the 2nd option, but i'm not a big DNS
operator so i have no clue if this is useful for you guys.
Any feedback is welcome!
Regards,
Ruben d'Arco
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 01:12:49AM +0100, Andrea Cappel
tps://github.com/cyclops1982/powerdns/compare/master...mydns.
Please note that i try to keep this branch up-to-date with Peter's master
branch, but it might be unstable or a little behind on SVN.
Any feedback is welcome!
Regards,
Ruben d'Arco
_
Hi Klaus,
Account details are listed on the front page (http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac) in
big black letters. Their so big that a lot of people just read over them
because they think it's a header of some sort.
Please read it carefully :)
Regards,
Ruben
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:18:25
Hi,
You have to do this manually.
I like the idea, so maybe add a feature request on the wiki for this?
http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac
Regards,
Ruben
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:36:16AM +, Marc van de Geijn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just googled for 30 minutes for information about SPF records
se 129
> Run time (s): 745.820314
> Queries per second: 15.868433
>
> Average Latency (s): 0.049470 (min 0.041367, max 0.078622)
> Latency StdDev (s): 0.004388
>
> Regards,
> Francois
Regards,
Ruben
> On 2012-08-31 10:18, Ruben d'
re
and partially why the backend was created - the master mode that the backend
provides should help you with this.
Kind regards,
Ruben d'Arco
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:53:58AM +0200, xbgmsharp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to the documentation
> (http://doc.powerdns.
Hi Xu,
There can be a number of reasons for this. RCODE=9 means Not Authorized.
Can you check if:
- disable-axfr is set to 'no'
- You have allow-axfr-ips set to the correct ip's.
- if the SOA record is correct for the zone
Regards,
Ruben
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0800, Xu Tingt
Hi,
Since (i think) powerdns 3.0, there is a pdnssec tool that might do what you
want.
You can try: pdnssec check-zone example.com
There are some outstanding enhacement requests, so it might not do exactly what
you want.
Also check out the manual page at: http://doc.powerdns.com/pdnssec.html
R
Hi,
There is the slave-cycle-interval which defines what the interval of the check
should be. The default is
60. The retrieval-threads setting defines "Number of AXFR-retrieval threads for
slave operation". The default
for this is 2. The retrieval-threads is not documented at the moment, but ca
e the results into certain
>order.
>
>at least, we can check the master side of axfr at first.
>
>best regards.
>
>2012/6/7 Ruben d'Arco
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> From the top of my head:
>> The order of results for an AXFR are different in all backens, t
Hi,
>From the top of my head:
The order of results for an AXFR are different in all backens, this means the
result only works for one backend, or we would need to add an expected result
for every backend.
I also think an AXFR test should involve a master and slave server to validate
the zone i
Hi Steven,
Could you explain with more detail what you mean with duplicate records? And
what you're trying to achieve?
As you can see in your own domain, putting a restriction/unique constraint on
the 'name' column won't work,
because you have a SOA and NS record for 'west.porto.net'. A constra
Hi,
Running a quite recent recursor version, i have this:
[18:20:13] cyclops@prof-x:~$ dig @127.0.0.1 +tcp www.detik.com any
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @127.0.0.1 +tcp www.detik.com any
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 30955
Hi,
Please check
http://doc.powerdns.com/allow-axfr-from.html
http://doc.powerdns.com/tsig.html#tsig-outbound-axfr
Regards,
Ruben
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:46:31PM +0200, Juraj Lutter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any way to specify AXFR networks on zone basis?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Jur
Hi Chris,
I've tried to reproduce your issue with the latest PDNS. Here's my record:
pdnstest=> select * from records where id=20172;
id | domain_id | name | type | content |
ttl | prio | change_date | ordername | auth
---+---++-
Hi Chris,
PowerDNS actually supports the SPF record type. Can you check if that works
better for you?
The content should be the same as you have now.
Regards,
Ruben
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:43:27AM -0400, Christopher Pruden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a PowerDNS setup, with the
Hi,
I think these links might be useful for you:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00
http://wilmer.gaa.st/edns-client-subnet/
I'm not sure, but i believe the pipebackend uses the ip address from the
edns-client-subnet and if that does not exist, falls back to the s
Hi,
On my debian stable (recursor 3.2) i have the same result.
On the current SVN, this work as you expect it.
I suggest you try a newer version of the recursor.
Regards,
Ruben
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 01:10:25PM -0500, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> Hi PDNS community,
>
> I am investigating a
50 matches
Mail list logo
