On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Christian Svenssonb...@cmd.nu wrote:
Yes, updating only one zone at the time is very much acceptable - that the
initial transfer takes quite long time does not matter.
We do not want to use an active database due to memory / CPU footprint. If
PowerDNS locks
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Norbert
Sendetzkynorb...@linuxnetworks.de wrote:
Hi Christian
After combating some weird incompatibility with Debian Lenny 5.0 where
PDNSs gsqlite3 refused to write anything to the database it begun to crash
when we did the initial transfer (notify of several
Very quick reply without thinking, make sure PowerDNS has write
permissions on the *directory* containing the sqlite3 database - this
tends to trip people up 'it can write to the file' is not enough.
I'll read your message more carefully to see what else might be happening.
Bert
On Sat, Jul
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Tom Muellert.muel...@strato-rz.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
sometimes the pdns_recursor doesn't send all A or records where
the requested CNAME points to.
Tom,
Do you run with an IPv6 local query address enabled? Can
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:48 AM,
InterNetworX|Hostmasterhostmas...@inwx.de wrote:
Hello,
we're running PowerDNS since a long time. Usaly TCP queries are working,
only from time to time we need to restart PowerDNS if it stops.
Hello InterNetwoX|Hostmaster,
Thank you for your report.
Can you
Hi everybody,
I've seen the discussion on the list, and I've had more questions
off-list about DNSSEC, DNSCurve and the quality and desirability of
these protocols. In the message below, I want to share some of my
thoughts on this, and then I kindly request everyone to have this
discussion
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Vladimir Elizarov
xengelpubl...@gmail.com wrote:
There are some replication between powerdns and dhcp?
Sadly, not yet. It turns out this is not easy to do. People sometimes
ask if we are pondering 'PowerDHCP' for this reason.
Bert
Hi everybody,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Roger Libiezrlib...@arthmoor.com wrote:
PDNS-Recursor version 3.1.7 from the download page. I'm unaware of there
being anything newer.
If the RPM package is any indication, it's Boost 1.37.
3.1.7 indeed does not compile with Boost 1.37 or
To nuance this a bit - on Linux, you can have great benefit from the
iptables 'NOTRACK' target, which can help you do firewalling that will
not run into problems from busy DNS traffic.
Bert
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Matthew Walster -
Gyronmatthew.wals...@gyron.net wrote:
Hi everybody,
I thought I'd let you know I'll be presenting on DNS at the famous HAR
2009 conference:
International technology security conference. Four days of
technology, ideological debates and hands-on tinkering.
On August 13-16, 2009 the 20th anniversary edition of the four-yearly
Dutch
Boost 1.39 is too new for the Recursor 3.1.7. Either use an older
Boost, or use a snapshot of the recursor, which has this problem
fixed.
Bert
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Jesse
Angelljesse.ang...@firespring.com wrote:
Any idea why this is happening?
Fails with: lwres.cc:184: error:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Marek
Kroemekema...@positive-internet.com wrote:
Hi there,
Thanks for suggestions. I was trying to find the particular domain that
could have some odd data in MySQL - but the problem is that this DNS
server seems to send around ~40 AXFR requests in a row - I
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Jesse
Angelljesse.ang...@firespring.com wrote:
I’m migrating from bind and one thing that I noticed is that bind returns
the NS records and the A records for those NS records with every query. I
noticed that PowerDNS does not do this and I’m trying to figure
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Gary Smithg...@primeexalia.com wrote:
Hello,
We have an SRPM for 2.9.21.2 that compiles fine. We are trying to update the
package to 2.9.22. In doing so we ran into an issue with configure not being
able to find ldap. So, trying it straight (without
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Jan Rudinskyrudi...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
Hello,
I have tested PDNS performance (configuration below). A zone transfer of 100
000 records takes ~ 10 s using either MySQL or file backends.
However Bind can make it in ~ 1 s (file-stored records).
Hi Jan,
We've
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Chris Modesittch...@veracitycom.net wrote:
What I have been seeing recently show up in the logs is:
Jun 22 09:09:38 dns1 pdns[10948]: 5003 questions waiting for database
attention. Limit is 5000, respawning
This is very consistent with a (brief) spike in
test post, please ignore.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
third test to get things working again..
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
aanmeldprocedure op
http://www.relatiedagsidn.nl of op de deelnemerssite van SIDN.
Ik zie jullie graag op 18 juni.
Groeten,
Bert Hubert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
Hi PowerDNS list readers,
Due to massive amounts of spam, the PowerDNS Mailman / Postfix installation
is having problems.
I think I have things working again, but some messages from the past week
may be lost.
So if your post did not make it, now might be a good time to re-send it.
Apologies
From: Darren Gamble darren.gam...@sjrb.ca
It doesn't, sorry.
I've previously opened up ticket #199 to request this functionality on a
per-zone basis. ?This is blocking replacing some of our DNS servers with
PowerDNS.
Half of the required functionality was added yesterday. What is left to
Johan,
Check if your domain_id field is filled out correctly for all records in
your zone.
It looks like they aren't. To check manually, try:
select id from domains where name='example.com';
select * from records wher domain_id=123;
where 123 is the domain id.
Then check to see if you see all
44 45 27
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:37 PM, bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote:
Johan,
Check if your domain_id field is filled out correctly for all records in
your zone.
It looks like they aren't. To check manually, try:
select id from domains where name='example.com
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 01:01:03PM +0100, Marco Chiavacci wrote:
- with bind we can change in named.conf for a domain the zone file (another
zone file) and during a reconfig this zone was reloaded properly
- with pdns we change in named.conf in same way zone file but during
rediscover domain
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 03:38:11AM -0500, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote:
At least you came up with a patch about as fast as I found the
bug! :-) (We only started testing powerdns a few days ago; it's
already one of the nameservers for apache.org and perl.org actually).
Cool! I read in your
Hi everybody,
Quoting from http://edns-ping.org :
EDNS-PING is an option within the EDNS DNS framework which allows
nameservers to protect themselves from certain spoofing attacks.
By default, responses to DNS questions are matched to their questions by
making sure they share the
One small note - EDNS-PING is *not* yet an official standard. It is like
buying a '802.11N DRAFT' router!
But it is unlikely the technical details (wire format) of EDNS-PING will
change, since the specification is so simple.
Bert
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 01:22:29AM +0100, bert hubert
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:38:53AM -0200, sysadmin wrote:
Hi,
It's possible setup recursor to point to a specific A record instead return
a error, if a domain do not exist ?
Please look into the 'lua' scripts, they make this possible. Search for
'Lua' in the manual to see how this works.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 07:21:38PM +0100, Arjan Schrijver wrote:
Hi list,
After some complaints that our DNS server was not answering all
questions correctly, we found out that our PowerDNS installation thinks
it's authoritative for the root '.' domain. The domain has domain_id 1,
so my
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:45:58PM +0100, Jeroen Wunnink wrote:
Is there a way to force a recurse even if a norecurse is set on the
requesting end (i.e. ignore the norecurse flag) ?
No.
I'm trying to forward non existing zones to a recursing backend which
will always reply with correct
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:03:07PM +0100, Marco Chiavacci wrote:
because nameserver.cc(117): error: destructible entities are not allowed
inside of a statement expression
htons is sometimes a very weird macro, so I can understand this error.
- the second problem is a strange thing because
Download from:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-2.9.22-rc1.tar.gz
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb/stable/pdns-static_2.9.22-rc1-1_i386.deb
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/rpm/pdns-static-2.9.22rc1-1.i386.rpm
2.9.22 will be a very important
This should of course be:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-2.9.22-rc2.tar.gz
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb/stable/pdns-static_2.9.22-rc2-1_i386.deb
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/rpm/pdns-static-2.9.22rc2-1.i386.rpm
Thanks to Ton van
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 03:10:27PM +0100, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
Hi Bert,
Is the patch also integrated in the snapshot 1293 (or up)?
It is! I recommend running: http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/1299/
or higher
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS
Download from:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-2.9.22-rc1.tar.gz
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb/stable/pdns-static_2.9.22-rc1-1_i386.deb
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/rpm/pdns-static-2.9.22rc1-1.i386.rpm
Hi Everybody,
2.9.22 will be a
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 05:54:46PM +0100, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
Hi all,
I decided to be adventurous and go ahead and install the snapshot.
Thanks Ton!
The auth server runs ok, so no problems there. The only problem I see
has to do with pdns_control.
Hmm, this smells like a bug that had
Hi everybody,
On http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/1293/ you can find snapshots of what
wil become 2.9.22-rc1 later this week, and probably 2.9.22 real soon after
that.
This is one of the biggest and imho most exciting Authoritative Server
releases in many years.
Thanks are due to UPC Broadband
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 07:53:06PM +0100, Dimitrij Hilt wrote:
Hi,
i discover that pdns process get 20 MB on virtual memory size on 64bit
Debian linux, after access to a webserver.
Wow - good catch. Can you open a ticket on wiki.powerdns.com?
Thanks!
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:04:12AM -0700, Tyler Hall wrote:
Wanted to update everyone on this. I've been working with ahu who has been
extremely helpful.
He added some code into my release to fix the problem I was having.
Thanks. This code is now part of the subversion version of PowerDNS,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 01:56:10PM +0100, Wouter de Jong wrote:
However I noticed you have a /64 zone and not a /48 zone in the config.
Can you make this work for a /48 zone as well?
Yep, I also have a few /48's in there.
No problem at all...
If Hugo reports a problem, you can be pretty
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:32:55PM -0700, Cameron Tacklind wrote:
I'm trying to make pdns on a Solaris 10. My goal is to get it running with a
(g)mysql backend.
Cameron,
Try boost 1.35. The PowerDNS in subversion is compatible with 1.36, but the
release versions are not.
Good luck!
--
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:43:32PM -0600, Darren Gamble wrote:
Hi everyone,
Just to throw my two cents in here...
I'm not sure what to do now - it might be good for PowerDNS to set the
'rd'
bit in forwarded queries.
We've been meaning to open up a trac ticket for this. Our
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:17:29AM +0100, Simon McCartney wrote:
I've written up some notes on achieving some form of WRR with PowerDNS here:
http://www.mccartney.ie/wordpress/2008/08/19/wrr-dns-with-powerdns/
Stunning :-)
This remind of me when I did binning like this:
select time_t -
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:06:19AM +0200, Bas wrote:
Hi Bert,
When compiling 2.9.21.1 i get the following error. (2.9.21 used to
build fine and still does.)
Bas,
I've fixed the tar.gz generation, there is an improved 2.9.21.1 on the
website now. It is the same code, but auto* has been
Released on the 6th of August 2008.
* http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-2.9.21.1.tar.gz
*
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb/stable/pdns-static_2.9.21.1-1_i386.deb
* http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/rpm/pdns-static-2.9.21.1-1.i386.rpm
* All UNIX/Linux distributions
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 09:29:27AM -0700, Daniel Greene - (mt) Media Temple
wrote:
Very strange.. we just had one of our 3-node pdns clusters go down, each
box with a different issue. One had segfaulted, one had hung on a FUTEX
call (from strace, though there was a bit of a rush to get the
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:39:04PM -0300, sysadmin wrote:
Regular zonefile format, with the exception of wildcards.
I setup recursor to load zone file as follow
* IN A 127.0.0.1
A * is a wildcard - which sadly does not work yet in the powerdns recursor
auth server.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 09:48:15AM +, Annoyed Tuna wrote:
Does anyone know where I can download Win32 binaries for 2.9.21?
Hello 'Annoyed Tuna',
I'm afraid there are no windows binaries for 2.9.21 - they are a lot of work
to create and we don't get enough interest for them.
Sorry.
--
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 07:30:13AM -0300, sysadmin wrote:
This should simply be:
zonadelafrontera.cl=malware
this format doesn't work too, the result still the same:
Marlon,
Please show your entire recursor configuration - I wonder if your file is
actually being loaded!
Bert
--
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:49:24PM +0200, Leen Besselink wrote:
I have an other reason I might want a windows binary. In this case
for PowerDNS-recursor.
You can compile the powerdns recursor on windows if you are reasonably
windows savvy. It takes me around two days to get it working usually.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:24:36PM +0200, Rick Jansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think there would be a lot more interest from Windows Server users, if
recent download packages would be available. And Windows users, I think,
are often more commercial users, with
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:37:27PM +0200, Leen Besselink wrote:
Is it a Visual Studio or something like cygwin you use to compile it ?
Visual studio express works very well, and it is a free (if complicated)
download.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:00:51AM +0200, Leen Besselink wrote:
I guess it depends how the UDP forwarder is implemented - there is no reason
why the forwarder wouldn't be able to use similarly randomised source ports
(but you would lose caching, of course)
I agree, but I've never seen one.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:47:08PM +0200, Gabriel J Marais wrote:
Resolved : Seems like the missing SOA and NS records were needed to
successfully do *wildcards in PDNS.
PowerDNS really needs SOA records in the database, otherwise it takes the
liberty to assume the zone is not there. This is
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 09:47:56AM -0300, Marlon wrote:
How I create a zone on recursor to block phishing sites ?
The other solution that was emailed works as well, but in addition, you can
use the 'auth-zones' in the configuration file to point these domains to a
zone containing nothing but a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:14:33PM -0300, Marlon wrote:
Sorry for the newbie question, but what is the format of zone file that
recursor accept ?
Regular zonefile format, with the exception of wildcards.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:08:40PM +0200, Ronny Wagner wrote:
Logmessage:
Jul 24 17:05:02 sv02 pdns[1]: TCP nameserver had error, cycling
backend: Reading data: Connection reset by peer
What is that for a fail message?
It is not very important - a remote nameserver that queried you
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:21:23PM +0200, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
I have a problem with some PowerDNS servers, running 2.9.20 with gmysql
backend, in particular with ANY queries. I get good results for some
domains but not for others, and I have no idea why.
Hi Martijn,
First let me say
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:45:44AM -0500, Nicholas Williams wrote:
I setup PowerDNS with a MySQL 5 backend on Centos 5 this morning. I put
in the test.com example records that come in the PowerDNS user guide.
When I perform a host query, as suggested in the guide, I get this:
Quick answer -
,
on-list or off.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
PowerDNS.COM BV
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Some more personal notes on this issue can be found on
http://blog.netherlabs.nl/articles/2008/07/09/some-thoughts-on-the-recent-dns-vulnerability
Bert
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:16:19PM +0200, bert hubert wrote:
We're being approached from various angles about PowerDNS and the recently
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 10:12:38PM +0600, Anatoliy Kushner wrote:
Is it possible to control number of threads in pdns_recursor ?
In docs i find only --fork parameter after wich i see 2 processes in
my process list
Anatoliy,
That is about right. Some tricks have been performed to run more
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:25:25AM +0600, Anatoliy Kushner wrote:
Is it possible to build pdns-recursor for solaris ?
Yes, and this is done frequently.
Bert
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:42:58PM -0700, Augie Schwer wrote:
I needed to apply the following before I could get the latest PowerDNS
Recursor (3.1.7) to build under CentOS 4 using Make version 3.80;
which admittedly is a version that is six years out of date.
Applied, thanks!
--
Available on:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-3.1.7.tar.bz2
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb/pdns-recursor_3.1.7-1_i386.deb
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb/pdns-recursor_3.1.7-1_amd64.deb
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:40:29AM +0200, Lazy wrote:
Hello,
We have some troble delegating the wlole domain on some other
nameserver. Delegating subdomains works flawlessly.
Are you trying to re-delegate a domain? So in the .pl zone it is delegated
to you, but you are trying to re-delegate it
Hi everybody,
In a few days time, version 3.1.7 of the PowerDNS Recursor will be released.
This is a rather exciting release because of the new scripting abilities, so
I ask you to take a good look at 3.1.7-rc3 to see if it does everything you
think it should be doing!
This version, or something
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:41:12PM +0200, Christopher Arnold wrote:
Is there any plans to add lua support to the resolver so we can add
loadbalancing etc. on a global scale for people accessing servers?
The recursor already has the 'pipe' backend allowing backends to be written
in any
Hi everybody,
Over the past week, together with a number of PowerDNS users and Lua
experts, I've added support for scripting the PowerDNS Recursor to do
interesting things.
From the provisional 3.1.7 release notes:
This version contains powerful scripting abilities, allowing operators to
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:04:53PM +0200, Norbert Sendetzky wrote:
Interesting concept.
What about performance if scripting abilities are compiled in?
Do you have any figures when simple scripts are used?
If the abilities are compiled in, but no script is loaded, the impact should
be
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 04:21:39PM -0700, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
How are you compiling the Lua script? How exactly are you executing
it? What sort of memory overhead can this create?
Everything is done using native Lua calls. The memory overhead should be
very small. The Lua interpreter runs
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:30:43PM -0600, Derrik Pates wrote:
A customer has recently led me to discover that pdns_recursor, when
performing a recursive query, such as looking for a 'A' record for the
likes of 119.177.179.77.zen.spamhaus.org, times out and fails due to the
fact that the
there are no firewalls. It sits on the
public network.
Eugene
-Original Message-
From: bert hubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:31 AM
To: Eugene Pefti
Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] this ubiquitous recursor again, problems
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:44:15AM -0700, Eugene Pefti wrote:
I know that nothing happens all of a sudden but one of my nameservers
started playing up again with the recursor.
Please provide version of pdns recursor and where you got it from. Is there
anything interesting about your
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:48:07AM -0600, Darren Gamble wrote:
OK. Well, you can easily see this behavior on pretty much any domain,
although the behavior doesn't cause an issue except in some unusual
cases. The situation I described is simply the one that results in many
calls to our call
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 07:56:32PM +0200, Albert wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with the transfer of the domain, the backup server is
not collected from the primary server. When you call the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] osanet.pl axfr-b 83.17.46.74
is charged only one record, in a zone where there are 7
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:52:19AM +0200, Albert wrote:
+---+---++--+---+---+--+-++
| id| domain_id | name | type | content
| ttl | prio |
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Jeroen Wunnink wrote:
Any way to block URL, CURL and MBOXFW records from trying to be
transferred over ?
Jeroen,
These records are 'fake' and I haven't implemented how they can travel over
DNS. Just leaving them out would break your zone I'm afraid.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:21:48PM +0200, Albert wrote:
Now I delte domain osanet.pl and add again and nothing has changed:
Do you have other domains that you can transfer on that server?
And another suggestion, can you fix the SOA record to have all the relevant
numbers?
Bert
--
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:43:44PM -0600, Darren Gamble wrote:
The issue is that the cache always caches information it receives in the
Authority Section. This can cause a problem where it indefinitely
consults a server that is no longer supposed to be authoritative for a
zone, but is still
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:54:56AM +0200, Flavio Curti wrote:
We run a powerdns 2.9.20 and a 2.9.21. We are secondary for a domain.
2.9.20 can fetch the domain from the primary, 2.9.21 gives the following
error:
So I understand correctly that neither 2.9.21 nor 'dig' can retrieve the
domain?
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 11:36:13AM +0200, Flavio Curti wrote:
2.9.21 can not, this is correct.
dig gives the full zone, but the warning embedded:
Your master nameserver is sending out corrupt packets, it sets the opcode
wrong.
If you really want this to work, you'll need to change this line
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 04:54:01PM +0200, Flavio Curti wrote:
Our customer is running Mac OS9 and mac dns 1.0.4 (shudder?!). Anyway,
he claims it has worked the last XYZ years. I'm a bit hesitating
patching the source, which I then have to repatch for every powerdns
release. Is there any
Released on the 1st of May 2008 - contains a small security fix.
Generic GPL sources:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-recursor-3.1.6.tar.bz2
32-bit Linux:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/deb/pdns-recursor_3.1.6-1_i386.deb
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:17:57PM -0700, Eugene Pefti wrote:
Can somebody explain me why the recursor cache size and latency are
correlated and directly proportional?
This is my dns graph.
http://ns2.w3media.net/recursor/
Whenever the cache grows up to 30K entries the latency reaches as high
This hardware is very very adequate. Please answer my other questions before
asking more yourself please.
Bert
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:39:38PM -0700, Eugene Pefti wrote:
I think I miss something here. Can somebody give an example of hardware
specs for the authoritative server with
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 09:00:30PM -0700, Eugene Pefti wrote:
I would highly appreciate if somebody help me. We rolled out powerdns into
production mode and after several hours of monitoring I found that the
recursor is not resolving queries.
The service restart could help but then again it
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:37:07PM -0700, Eugene Pefti wrote:
I would support Alexx's statement about the overall performance. Just now
one of my nameservers died with
Can I suggest that you answer my questions from yesterday? That would
actually allow me to help you.
PowerDNS 2.9.21 is used
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:44:44AM +0200, Oli Schacher wrote:
I wrote a script to mass-notify a few domains:
Version please?
We have two slaves running on Centos 5, using sqlite3 backend. When I
ran this script, using about 40 domains, one slave crashed:
Interesting.
Apr 7 11:11:59 ns1
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:30:14PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, I hope
that someone here can give some advice regarding the following.
It is indeed not the right place. The only people that can act on this are
the copyright
Dear PowerDNS users,
Following snapshot5, 'release candidate 1' is released today. RC1 is
expected to be final, so your help in testing right now is very appreciated,
and should be relatively risk free. RC1 is already running in production in
some places, as is snapshot5.
.tar.bz2 (source):
Regards,
Ton van Rosmalen
bert hubert schreef:
Dear PowerDNS users,
PowerDNS Recursor 3.1.5 is around the corner, shaping up to be a rather
important upgrade, and we need your help!
3.1.5 is in large scale production use in some places already, which has
helped shake out a number
Clearw're
Senior Systems Engineer
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Duane
Sent: Sat 3/15/2008 4:21 PM
To: pdns-users
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] TinyDNS backend for PowerDNS
bert hubert wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:52:21AM +1100, Duane wrote
it is for us.
Please contact me on how to transfer these files to me. We will treat your
anonymised data as confidential, of course.
Kind regards,
Bert Hubert
PowerDNS
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source
Hi everybody,
The provisional release notes for PowerDNS Recursor 3.1.5 can be found on:
http://doc.powerdns.com/changelog.html#CHANGELOG-RECURSOR-3-1-5
Snapshot 5 is available on:
http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/pdns-recursor-3.1.5-snapshot5.tar.bz2
For Linux, i386:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:17:58AM +1100, Duane wrote:
bert hubert wrote:
This is because PowerDNS internally makes 'backend queries', not 'dns
queries'. This in turn is because we want to free the backend from knowing
about DNS logic - otherwise it would have to follow CNAME chains etc
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:52:21AM +1100, Duane wrote:
I'm unhappy it doesn't match your needs though, but perhaps you want
something else. Basically you get a lot of ANY queries, instead of queries
for the exact type requested. This turns out to be a large speedup, but it
may hurt you.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 02:58:18PM -0800, Mathew Hennessy wrote:
I've tried converting from BIND9 to PowerDNS configured as a slave with
opendbx/sqlite3, and I'm still not getting any love. How can I trick the
master into not sending SERVFAIL for this demonstration setup?
If PowerDNS is not
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 08:35:09AM +0100, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
Yeah. I have stumbled over the same feature. Even after reading the
manual from cover to cover. So I would suggest to add a comment to the
default sample config file that this particular option is for windows only.
I think
Hi IPv6 friends,
Since the root zone now contains records, as do many TLD zones, I've
given our IPv6 support a lot of love.
Please test
http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/pdns-recursor-3.1.5-snapshot4.tar.bz2
It should be *completely* IPv6/IPv4 agnostic, in that it can resolve domains
like
601 - 700 of 844 matches
Mail list logo
