On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 05:24:05PM +0200, George Asenov wrote:
> Yes I understand that this test is not relevant!
>
> The one think I didn't understand is why two different services working with
> 2 different users share 1 core at 100% and not working on separate
> cores/treads ?
> Even if the
Yes I understand that this test is not relevant!
The one think I didn't understand is why two different services working
with 2 different users share 1 core at 100% and not working on separate
cores/treads ?
Even if the requests are not overlapping i think the two services should
work
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 05:08:50PM +0200, George Asenov wrote:
>
> Here is a dnsperf test
> https://monosnap.com/direct/IijS7l37a4r1Ck7dVKeO1UAf6kvEg0
>
> # dnsperf -s XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -c 1 -T 5 -d domainslist.txt -n 100
> DNS Performance Testing Tool
> Nominum Version 2.1.0.0
>
> [Status]
Here is a dnsperf test
https://monosnap.com/direct/IijS7l37a4r1Ck7dVKeO1UAf6kvEg0
# dnsperf -s XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -c 1 -T 5 -d domainslist.txt -n 100
DNS Performance Testing Tool
Nominum Version 2.1.0.0
[Status] Command line: dnsperf -s XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX -c 1 -T 5 -d
domainslist.txt -n
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 02:28:48PM +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On 31/10/2019 13:44, George Asenov wrote:
> > For example if the mariadb get 70% pdns 30% if i check the load by cores
> > one core has 0%id all other 3 are near 100%id .
> > here are some screenshots
>
> Looks like sequential
On 31/10/2019 13:44, George Asenov wrote:
For example if the mariadb get 70% pdns 30% if i check the load by
cores one core has 0%id all other 3 are near 100%id .
here are some screenshots
Looks like sequential operation to me:
1. pdns sends a query to mariadb (goes to sleep waiting for
Hello,
We have a setup with hidden master (with couple of thousand zones) with
like 30 slaves which is slave of multiple BIND masters. The setup works
well but we are concerned about the subject.
If the first level master (where all the changes happen) is restarted
for example it sends
