On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:41:37AM +0700, Genzo Rey wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm looking for new Nameserver solutions for my company. I build 1 VPS
> PowerDNS 512 MB RAM and 1 VPS MySQL 512MB RAM to test performance (qps).
> This is my results:
>
> [Status] Sending queries (to 192.168.10.143)
> [St
art91091
Email: lionheart91...@outlook.com, lionheart91...@gmail.com,
lionheart91...@icloud.com
-Original Message-
From: bert hubert [mailto:bert.hub...@powerdns.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 03:47
To: Genzo Rey
Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS Bac
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:41:37AM +0700, Genzo Rey wrote:
> I'm looking for new Nameserver solutions for my company. I build 1 VPS
> PowerDNS 512 MB RAM and 1 VPS MySQL 512MB RAM to test performance (qps).
> This is my results:
Hi Genzo,
Did you try 10 unique queries?
Secondly, which versio
Dear All,
I'm looking for new Nameserver solutions for my company. I build 1 VPS
PowerDNS 512 MB RAM and 1 VPS MySQL 512MB RAM to test performance (qps).
This is my results:
[Status] Sending queries (to 192.168.10.143)
[Status] Started at: Tue Jul 19 02:58:04 2016
[Status] Stopping after
The README file describes motivations behind design choices.
Dean
On 11/05/15 21:55, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:29:34PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
>> Dear Pdns-Users
>>
>> I am hoping for feedback on a proof of concept (aka quick hack) that
>> has powerdns serve forward and re
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:29:34PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> Dear Pdns-Users
>
> I am hoping for feedback on a proof of concept (aka quick hack) that
> has powerdns serve forward and reverse DNS records from a template
> and a list of cidr's - implemented via gpgsql. Let's call it a
> quasi-ba
Dear Pdns-Users
I am hoping for feedback on a proof of concept (aka quick hack) that has
powerdns serve forward and reverse DNS records from a template and a
list of cidr's - implemented via gpgsql. Let's call it a quasi-backend.
The use case is having millions of forward and reverse records
one silly question. even I need to write my own backend, I still need to use
pipebackend option, rite?
Or you can use the Luabackend, which was written precisely to solve
issues like yours.
--
//fredan
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.
If you have your own backend, you can use pipe or remote to adapt to it. That's
the whole point of pipe/remotebackend. It lets you easily write adapters to
speak with custom backends. These enable you to communicate with custom stuff
very easily. Look at the script I sent earlier.
Writing native
Thanks
THis is what I confused. the information on how to write the native backend
seems telling how to write the backend? but I actually have the backend in
place, just that pDNS cannot comnuicate with it.
so my question is whether I should write an adapter and embedded in pDNS or
else?
I just
You might want to use pipe/remotebackend to model your backend first, as you
can use "whatever" you want to write this model. Once you understand this, you
could then convert it to a native C++ backend. Please refer to doc.powerdns.com
on how to write a native backend.
Aki
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 a
understand.
I actually have a client that accessing my customerize non-sql backend. It
looks like I need to create a C application to work with the pDNS.
is there any sample that I can refer to.
- rbk
Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> Um. No.
>
> It's like this:
>
> pipe and remotebackends act as cond
Um. No.
It's like this:
pipe and remotebackends act as conduits that let you use whatever as the real
backend by converting the requests into some plain text format. Such as
tab separated query or json.
This lets you use script languages (perl,ruby,python,sh,whatnot) as the actual
backend, and
Hi Aki
understood.
one silly question. even I need to write my own backend, I still need to use
pipebackend option, rite?
- rbk
Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> It is difficult to measure performance for scripted APIs as that depends
> on
> what you do in the backend. However, due to reasons like JSON
It is difficult to measure performance for scripted APIs as that depends on
what you do in the backend. However, due to reasons like JSON parsing and
generally more complex processing, remotebackend is probably slower than
equivalent pipe backend.
The best performance can be gained by writing
Thanks
Considering performance, which backend should I used?
Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> And now that I started making this, it became evident that remotebackend
> has a
> major failure in it. Good news is that there is a patch for it in ticket
> #697
>
> The sample script is here: http://cmouse.d
And now that I started making this, it became evident that remotebackend has a
major failure in it. Good news is that there is a patch for it in ticket #697
The sample script is here: http://cmouse.desteem.org/remote.rb
Aki Tuomi
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:08:48PM +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Hi!
Hi!
I'll create a sample script for you.
Aki
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:56:22AM -0800, RBK1001 wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I need more information on how I can perform Remote Backend? is there any
> more information that I can refer to?
>
> - rbk
>
>
> Roman Gaufman-2 wrote:
> >
> > PowerDNS can fo
Hi
I need more information on how I can perform Remote Backend? is there any
more information that I can refer to?
- rbk
Roman Gaufman-2 wrote:
>
> PowerDNS can fork the process as many times as you configure using
> the distributor-threads option.
>
> The good thing is the process remains r
PowerDNS can fork the process as many times as you configure using
the distributor-threads option.
The good thing is the process remains running and kept running by
PowerDNS's guardian so I think it will be more limited by your process than
by PowerDNS :)
Re: Peter van Dijk
Thank you for that, I
Hello Roman,
On Feb 4, 2013, at 10:35 , Roman Gaufman wrote:
> The above is an example written in Ruby, but really it just reads DNS
> requests from STDIN and writes DNS responses to STDOUT. You can add any
> custom code that will figure out the IP to your question - in my case I plan
> to que
Hi
Thank for the reply. If using pipebackend/bindbackend, is the performance
acceptable when comparing within mysql/pgsql?
- rbk
Roman Gaufman-2 wrote:
>
> I really love the simplicity of pipe backend and why I use powerdns
> instead
> of say bind, all you need to really do is add this to yo
I really love the simplicity of pipe backend and why I use powerdns instead
of say bind, all you need to really do is add this to your pdns.conf:
launch=pipe,bind
pipe-command=/etc/powerdns/dns_pipe.rb
And in your script, you can have something as simple as:
require 'powerdns_pipe'
PowerDNS::Pip
Hi
Thank for the information.
I have a bit confused on the the pipebackend and bind backend, which one
should I use?
- rbk
Ruben '_cyclops_' d'Arco wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This should be helpful as a first start:
> http://doc.powerdns.com/backend-writers-guide.html
>
> Also have a look at the
Or you can employ pipebackend or remotebackend if you don't want to write
the backend completely yourself. These provide script-based API to use, which
can be easier to employ than writing a backend. Documentation for these can
be found from http://doc.powerdns.com/. If you need DNSSEC, you'll wan
Hi,
This should be helpful as a first start:
http://doc.powerdns.com/backend-writers-guide.html
Also have a look at the regression-test direcory, as it is quiet helpul for
testing your backend.
Regards,
Ruben
RBK1001 wrote:
>
>Hi
>
>we would like to seek for an advice on the use of back
Hi
we would like to seek for an advice on the use of backend.
we understood that PowerDNS offers several backend solutions, however, I
would like to know is there a way to connect to our customerized backend?
Currently, we are using a non-sql customerized backend with large amount of
data stored
27 matches
Mail list logo
