On 05/21/2011 06:27 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011, k...@rice.edu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:37:24AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We've been using the PDNS recursor for some time now and have been
>>> quite
>>> happy with it. It replaced dnscac
On Thu, 12 May 2011, k...@rice.edu wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:37:24AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello,
We've been using the PDNS recursor for some time now and have been quite
happy with it. It replaced dnscache and has proven to perform much better.
We're now looking at moving
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:37:24AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've been using the PDNS recursor for some time now and have been quite
> happy with it. It replaced dnscache and has proven to perform much better.
>
> We're now looking at moving away from tinydns, mainly to get I
werDNS and how. That said though, the
list is very helpful :)
Cheers
Chris
-Original Message-
From: pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com
[mailto:pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman
Sent: 12 May 2011 08:37
To: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject
Hello,
We've been using the PDNS recursor for some time now and have been quite
happy with it. It replaced dnscache and has proven to perform much better.
We're now looking at moving away from tinydns, mainly to get IPv6
support without patching and to get started with DNSSEC. I don't see us
wi
