Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 01:58:40AM -0700, ymicromed wrote: Hi, To fix this problem, you don't have to add your ns4 to the NS records. *use the pdnssec utility:* pdnssec rectify-zone test.com This will not cause domain transfers, sorry :( If you want to have your domain notified to

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

Hi Aki, Thanks for your reply. I meant by my post that the 3 slaves ns1, ns2, ns3 didn't accept the notification from the SUPERMASTER ns4. I've had the same situation, and after rectifying the zone on the master ns4, it worked for me, and slaves started axfr transfer from the supermaster. I

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 03:25:51AM -0700, ymicromed wrote: Hi Aki, Thanks for your reply. I meant by my post that the 3 slaves ns1, ns2, ns3 didn't accept the notification from the SUPERMASTER ns4. I've had the same situation, and after rectifying the zone on the master ns4, it worked

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

Hi Aki, Thanks, My earlier answer (that worked for me) was originated from: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/issues/546 Have a nice day Momo -- View this message in context: http://powerdns.13854.n7.nabble.com/Supermaster-Slaves-Supermaster-has-to-be-a-listed-NS-tp9276p10152.html Sent

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster / slaves

Hi Ed, Op 26-11-12 17:08, Ed schreef: Hi, I've looked through the documentation and searched the archives and haven't found a concrete answer to this issue: We have a hidden master that updates slaves that are the internet facing DNS resolvers, they are not recursive. We want to use

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

Sorry about that, didn't use reply to all. Here's a copy of my settings in table supermasters on the slaves. +---++--+ | ip | nameserver | account | +---++--+ | ip of hidden ns| ns1.yourdomain.com | internal |

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Nicholas Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's just that when I left out ns4 from the ns records for that zone ns2 ns3 complained about not being able to find a backend for this zone from supermaster ns4. As soon as I added ns4 as a ns record of the zone and

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

Nicholas.Orr wrote: Hi, I managed to get supermaster working again. One question though. Does the server that is supermaster have to be listed in a NS record for the zone being delegated to the Slave? I was hoping I could setup ns1 - primary - slave ns2 - secondary - slave ns3 -

Re: [Pdns-users] Supermaster Slaves - Supermaster has to be a listed NS?

Mathew Hennessy schreef: Nicholas.Orr wrote: Hi, I managed to get supermaster working again. One question though. Does the server that is supermaster have to be listed in a NS record for the zone being delegated to the Slave? I was hoping I could setup ns1 - primary - slave