RE: [PEIRCE-L] Invigorating Philosophy with Natural Propositions

Gary, List , I agree with the difference between PS and PP, especially after having been in the SIAP at Oregon University in EUGENE. There, in a conference about political philosophy, it was raised that political philosophy can be considered a vision, or be used as a tool. Philosophy in ge

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:6231] Re: biosemiotics is the basis for

Sung, you wrote to Stephen, [QUOTE] "Your written word just conveyed energy to my (6231-1) fingers to say NO." I did not write any words on a piece of paper (which would have been an example of equilibrium structure, since no energy would have been required for them to exist on

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:6231] Re: biosemiotics is the basis for

John wrote: "In particular I argued that dissipative and (072914-1) non-dissipative is a scale dependent distinction." I would agree. That is, there may be no "absolute" scale at which some systems are dissipative and some are at equilibrium. Perhaps we can define a dissipative s

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:6231] Re: biosemiotics is the basis for

At 11:28 PM 2014-07-28, Clark Goble wrote: (Sorry for any repeats - I accidentally sent several emails from the wrong account so they didn’t make it to the list) On Jul 26, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Sungchul Ji wrote: Peircean scholars and philosophers in general seem to find it d