Re: [PEIRCE-L] Q. Why is there so much falsity in the world?

2014-09-01 Thread Sungchul Ji
I agree with Edwina, for once, The Taoist philosophy extols "moo-wee" (in Korean) which translates into "no action" or "not doing" as far better than doing something unnecessary, wasteful, harmful or stupid. With all the best. Sung ___ Sungchul Ji

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Q. Why is there so much falsity in the world?

2014-09-01 Thread Jon Awbrey
Edwina, I find it surprising that there is so much falsity in the world. Think of politics. It is not surprising that some politicians think it to their advantage to play false with the people they are supposed to represent. It is surprising that the people buy their lies as long as they do. N

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Q. Why is there so much falsity in the world?

2014-09-01 Thread Stephen C. Rose
Creativity is inherent. To the extent that teaching in the sense of formal education enters the picture, it seems neutral at best and in many contexts destructive of creativity. I am not sure what Peirce thinks about what is inherent within a person and what is acquired, but the statement you quote

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Q. Why is there so much falsity in the world?

2014-09-01 Thread Edwina Taborsky
That's an interesting comment, Gary R - but I don't agree. I don't think that creativity is something that can or must be taught. I think that we humans are naturally curious, exploratory and thus, creative. You can watch any young child at play to see this, as they put together strange sandpile

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Q. Why is there so much falsity in the world?

2014-09-01 Thread Gary Richmond
Edwina, Jon, list, A friend of mine, a Peirce scholar not currently in this forum, just happened to include this comment in a personal note. I thought it had some relevance. To the extent that humans are not taught to be creative, they will be destructive (even if only by default; even doing noth

[PEIRCE-L] peirce bibliographic database

2014-09-01 Thread sb
List, last year i had a short exchange with Vinicius about a database containing all the bibliographic info for the ms, letters, published works and the crossreferences to the CP, W and the online material. I talked big then and said the coding could be only hours or a couple of days work. I

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Q. Why is there so much falsity in the world?

2014-09-01 Thread Edwina Taborsky
You are playing games with us, Jon! You haven't said WHY you consider that people 'prefer falsity to truth, illusion to reality'. And I don't agree with your conclusion, for it carries within it an assumption that truth and reality are unpleasant. Are they? What about - the fact (truth, real

[PEIRCE-L] Q. Why is there so much falsity in the world?

2014-09-01 Thread Jon Awbrey
A. Because people prefer falsity to truth, illusion to reality. ⁂ Being the drift of my reflections on the plays I saw at Stratford this summer — King Lear, King John, Man of La Mancha, Alice Through the Looking-Glass, Crazy for You, Hay Fever. ⁂ The Beaux’ Stratagem • Masks, Madness, & Shakes

[PEIRCE-L] RE: Natural Propositions

2014-09-01 Thread Gary Fuhrman
Jon, I see what you mean, but I think "anti-psychologism" is accurate enough, given Peirce's frequently vociferous statements that logic should NOT draw principles from psychology. But maybe we should wait until next week for that discussion, after Jeff Kasser leads off a new thread on Chapter 2.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Parsimonious Peirce

2014-09-01 Thread Clark Goble
> On Aug 31, 2014, at 6:24 AM, Stephen C. Rose wrote: > > Reading on my Kindle the remarkably-edited text CP (a compendium of segments > of Peirce statements), I didn’t know CP was available as an ebook. I looked on Amazon but didn’t see it. Where did you get the ebook version? ---

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions

2014-09-01 Thread Michael Shapiro
Frederik, List,The book's leitmotif of not limiting dicisigns to human language sounds right, and I look forward to finding out how you develop this part of your treatment as I continue reading the book. However, as your compatriot Louis Hjelmslev also insisted (successfully, in my opinion), human

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Natural Propositions

2014-09-01 Thread Jon Awbrey
Re:Frederik Stjernfelt At:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/13825 Frederik, One small point that I find myself making on a periodic basis: I think it is better to describe Peirce's take on logic as "non-psychologism" rather than anti-psychologoism", the main thing bein

[PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions

2014-09-01 Thread Frederik Stjernfelt
Why "Natural Propositions"? The book "Natural Propositions" grew out of my investigation of Peirce's general notion of diagrams and diagrammatical reasoning in "Diagrammatology" (2007). If it is indeed the case that all deduction takes place by means of transformation of diagrams, implicitly or

[PEIRCE-L] Stjernfelt Seminar: Chapter 1, Introduction

2014-09-01 Thread Gary Fuhrman
Esteemed members of the peirce-l and biosemiotics lists, Today we begin an online seminar that will continue into 2015, based on Frederik Stjernfelt's Natural Propositions (henceforth NP), which was published earlier this year. In some respects this seminar will resemble the study of Cornelis de W