Mara, thanks for this! Damasio is one of the neuroscientists who have developed
in great detail our understanding of perception as part of a functional cycle.
He’s not the only one, of course; I’ve cited several others in my book Turning
Signs, especially in Chapter 9
Mara, that’s a very good question you’ve raised. I’ll insert my responses below.
From: Mara Woods [mailto:mara.wo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14-Nov-14 3:45 PM
All,
In section 5.2, Stjernfelt brings up the “Adaptation to Rationality” hypothesis
in conjunction with the issue of logical
We think sequentially by necessity. Whoops. Thought gone. But seriously, I
wonder if triangles do not move. In other words they cannot be fixed. Does
that mean that no product of triadic thinking can be fixed. Probably so.
Generals are fixed. Maybe in the CSP way of communal consensus and whatever
Well, Edwina, I am not going to list specks of evidence, you need to read the
literature. I got it primarily through studying distributed cognition,
especially to teach it for several years in our cognitive science programme.
Key words are distributed social knowledge, scaffolding, and
John - I think we are talking about two different issues. No-one is arguing
that our knowledge base (distributed cognition) is not developed within
societal constraints and focus, but at the same time - to claim that our
knowledge is ONLY societal and thus deductive and cannot be questioned,
On Nov 16, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Sungchul Ji wrote:
Hi,
I just learned that the simplest category in the category theory is the
commutative triangle. The next simple one would be the commutative square
Sung:
After posting examples (perhaps hundreds?) of your beliefs about category
theory,
Dear Jerry,
Thanks for your informative comments.
Yes. I agree, I have a long journey into the open and evolving world of
category theory.
As you know I have been using commutative triangles for the past couple
of years on these lists, without calling them by that name, I just
referred to them
Jon, list,
Somebody recently brought to my attention off-list a typo in the
synechism quote that I sent on November 10, 2014.
prescribing what sort of hypotheses are lit to be entertained and examined
should instead be:
prescribing what sort of hypotheses are fit to be entertained and
(Arisbe) Charles Sanders Peirce: ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY: Home Page of
the International Peirce Community http://buff.ly/1BG3CMM
I do what I can to alert Twitter folk to Peirce. I remember an excellent
introductory statement listing all of his impacts. But when I took a look
just now I could
Maybe you're talking about Joe Ransdell's FAQ Who Is Charles Peirce?
http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/faqs/whoiscsp.HTM
http://www.iupui.edu/%7Earisbe/faqs/whoiscsp.HTM
Best, Ben
On 11/16/2014 8:59 PM, Stephen C. Rose wrote:
(Arisbe) Charles Sanders Peirce: ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY: Home Page
10 matches
Mail list logo
