Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Science (was Democracy)

2016-12-10 Thread Gary Richmond
Helmut, list, Helmut wrote: The hypothesis is dark matter, but there is no dark matter available for experiments. Also the string theory is not verifiable with experiments, because the hypothetic strings are smaller than anything detectable. So nowadays physics is somehow comparable with

Aw: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Science (was Democracy)

2016-12-10 Thread Helmut Raulien
Gary, List, you wrote:   "I can't make much sense of your "trichotomy," but its theoretical content at least would find its place in the third division of logic as semeiotic, namely, methodeutic (also called speculative or, theoretical rhetoric), for there one is concerned with all that is

Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Science (was Democracy)

2016-12-10 Thread Gary Richmond
Helmut, List, The trichotomic division of Physical Science (not only physics, but all the physical sciences) which we've been discussing in this thread is that outlined in the third branch of Science of Discovery (= pure, or, theoretical science), that is, *Idioscopy*, or, the Special Sciences.