Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's classification of the sciences

Dear Tommi, Before getting into the details, I'd like to emphasize that my primary interest in drawing CSPscience.jpg is in the dotted lines that show dependencies among the sciences. Tommi Peirce's classification of sciences with the definitions of the different sciences was once for me one

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's classification of the sciences

Tommi, List: Your post bring to the front (at least for me) a central problem of philosophy, especially of synthetic philosophy in contrast to retrospective philosophy. EP 2:372. > On Aug 28, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Tommi Vehkavaara wrote: > > > CP 1.232 "Now if we are to

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's classification of the sciences

Dear John, Gary F., and list Peirce's classification of sciences with the definitions of the different sciences was once for me one of the keys that systematized my reading of Peirce's other writings and made them much more understandable. On issue that have puzzled my mind is to which