[PEIRCE-L] Systematic Framework for Speculative Grammar

List: I have posted several different summaries recently of my current (still tentative) understanding of Signs and their relations, which hinges on carefully and consistently differentiating a *Sign* from its embodiment in a *Replica*, and both of these from an *Instance* of the Sign as a one-tim

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being

Dear Jerry C, list, perhaps I am.. which reminds me.. peirce's esthetics, beautiful and unbeautiful. Best, Jerry R On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Jerry LR Chandler < jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com> wrote: > Jerry R: > > In response to your query, I have no idea. > > Even the notion of any two

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being

Jerry R: In response to your query, I have no idea. Even the notion of any two humans having the “same ego” is foreign to my way of thinking. Perhaps you are thinking of a superficial similarity of styles of expression? Cheers Jerry C. > On Sep 17, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Jerry Rhee wrote: > >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being (was How should semeiotic be classified?

List: > On Sep 13, 2018, at 10:33 AM, John F Sowa wrote: > > But > everything that is imaginable can be described by some theory > of pure mathematics. How can one describe a “feeling” in pure mathematical terms? I will answer my own question. Simply quote W.O Quine: “To be is to be a variab

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being (was How should semeiotic be classified?

John: The origin of the six “bullets” listed below is unclear. Are these your personal evaluations of CSP texts? I ask because it appears to me that # 2 is simply false. The chemical alphabet is finite. Cheers Jerry > > On Thu 13/09/18 10:03 AM , John F Sowa s...@bestweb.net >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being

Dear Jerry, list, What does Peirce mean by “entertain a metaphysical theory that they are all *hypostatically the same ego*”? Does he mean me and you? Jon and Gary? Edwina and kirsti? John and Jeff? Thanks, Jerry On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Jerry LR Chandler < jerry_lr_chand..

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories and Modes of Being

John: > On Sep 15, 2018, at 5:28 PM, John F Sowa wrote: > > To avoid the controversy, I'll delete the phrase "partial and narrow" > and replace it with a line that says normative logic is the "theory > of self-controlled or deliberate thought". > Hmmm… Does this really help? How does a thought