Re: [PEIRCE-L] Terminology of Peirce's final sign classification

2018-09-22 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Robert, List: Thanks for your comments, and for joining the List discussion. RM: Od->Oi->S-->Ii-->Id->If I disagree. The Destinate Interpretant is what the Sign is *destined *to signify at the end of infinite inquiry by an infinite community; i.e., the *Final *Interpretant

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Terminology of Peirce's final sign classification

2018-09-22 Thread John F Sowa
On 9/22/2018 10:59 AM, marty.rob...@neuf.fr wrote: /It is evident that a possible can determine nothing but a Possible, it is equally so that a Necessitant can be determined by nothing but a Necessitant./ Thank you for that reminder (EP 2.481). In an earlier note on another topic, I discuss

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Terminology of Peirce's final sign classification

2018-09-22 Thread marty . robert
Jon Alan, list JAS : " How might we restate this in accordance with Peirce's later terminology of multiple Objects and Interpretants? " RM : It is not only a new terminology but mostly another extended definition of the sign with 6 constituents (that I named hexadic sign). The definition by

Re: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pure and applied mathematics

2018-09-22 Thread John F Sowa
On 9/21/2018 3:05 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote: so mathematics perhaps is the only example, for which Platon´s idea of "idea" is correct. All phenomena can be explained with mathematics. Though only afterwards, subsequently? As Peirce said, diagrammatic reasoning is the foundation for all necessar