Re: [PEIRCE-L] Guidelines for scholarship (was On-line Symposium...

2019-07-17 Thread Eugene Halton
JFS: "Opinions are never acceptable in a court of law or in a scholarly edition." I'm no expert, but in the US, if I may nitpick: THELAW.COM LAW DICTIONARY & BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 2ND ED. "EXPERT TESTIMONY The opinion stated in court by an expert witness. An admissible expert opinion given in co

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Guidelines for scholarship (was On-line Symposium...

2019-07-17 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
John, List: JFS: Maintain a sharp distinction between an author's "ipsissima verba" and any commentary about them. Again, I believe that I have consistently done this. JFS: If an author did not state something explicitly, any claims about the text are opinions of the commentator. Of course,

[PEIRCE-L] test

2019-07-17 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; } Test post - PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not t

[PEIRCE-L] Guidelines for scholarship (was On-line Symposium...

2019-07-17 Thread John F Sowa
Jon, I agree that my comments were about methods of reasoning rather than specific issues about Lane's book. So I changed the subject line. JAS As for this thread, it is supposed to be about Peirce's views on realism and idealism as explored by Lane in his recent book, not our different purpos