Cf: Differential Logic, Dynamic Systems, Tangent Functors • Discussion 9
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/07/19/differential-logic-dynamic-systems-tangent-functors-%e2%80%a2-discussion-9/
Re: FB | Systems Sciences
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2391509563/permalink/10158218873839564/
Re: Kenne
List,
I submit to you new argumented clarifications on the concordance between
the affinities between classes of signs diagrammatized by CS Peirce and the
lattice of the classes of signs. I hope you find them convincing.Here is
the abstract of this 10-page text:
https://www.academia.edu/43672037
As I’ve said before, I think this lattice is superb. I well remember Robert
Marty’s outline of the path of nicotine. And how clearly this image sets up for
us the difference between a semiotic path that is grounded in reality [Dicents]
and one that veers off towards the purely rhetorical, to non
John, List:
I am not at all disputing that application is necessary for full
understanding. After all, the logic of interpretation that I described in
the first two posts of this thread is itself an application of Peirce's
logic of abduction/retroduction. I am simply pointing out that one must
*
Jon AS,
Comparing Peirce's texts to the instructions on a 5th grade
exam is like comparing quantum mechanics to 2+2=4.
William James
was Peirce's closest friend. He had spent years talking with CSP and
reading his writings. But he described Peirce's lectures as flashes of
brilliant light re
List:
> On Jul 19, 2020, at 10:34 AM, John F. Sowa wrote:
>
> Since Peirce was so far ahead of his time, his contemporaries couldn't
> understand them, and he had no examples that he could cite.
See: W8, p. 37.
Throughout his life, CSP consistently selected example from the bedrock of his
