Jon AS, List,
The *opinion* that the EG version of June 1911 is
Peirce's best is Peirce's own, as he stated in December, after six months
of further consideration. The fact that he stated it in a lengthy letter
to a member of Lady Welby's significs group is further evidence of its
importance.
John, List, All:
JFS: Again, you have not cited any statements by Peirce after June 1911.
Therefore, nothing in your note contradicts the evidence that the 1911
version of EGs is Peirce's best and last available version.
That it is his *last *version is a fact, as far as we know. That it is
his
Jon, List,
Again, you have not cited any statements by Peirce
after June 1911. Therefore, nothing in your note contradicts the evidence
that the 1911 version of EGs is Peirce's best and last available
version.
Furthermore, Peirce's letters of Sept. and Dec. 1911
explicitly reject the version
Thanks, Jon.
Any comments would be welcome. I do like Katz’s work.
The title of the book I am doing for OUP (I had to put off the bio of Peirce
until libraries open back up) is Peircean Linguistics: A Chapter in the History
of Realist Thought. Hence my more than passing interest in linguistic
Thanks, Dan,
That brings me a twinge of pleasant nostalgia, but there a few fresh things
I could say about it all from my current perspective when I next get a chance.
Very generally speaking, however, so much of current philosophical thought,
in or out of the Peirce realm, is so deeply
Cf: Charles Sanders Peirce, George Spencer Brown, and Me • 4
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2017/08/06/charles-sanders-peirce-george-spencer-brown-and-me-4/
All,
Two things that had a big impact on my studies of Peirce and Spencer Brown
over the years were my parallel studies in mathematics and
