I write on behalf of an acquaintance who is a statistician and Peirce
enthusiast. He's interested in obtaining a typescript of MS 905 in the Robin
catalog. Here's the characterization from the Robin catalog:
905. One, Two, Three
A. MS., notebook, n.p., December 7, 1907 (the earliest of several d
Edwina, Jon A.S, List,
Now I think that the difference between consequence and double negation can be explained with classical logic, or, if my explanation is not classical logic, at least intuitionalism as constructivistic theory is not necessary, and neither the Peircean categories. What
Supplement: I forgot to adress Auke, and I forgot to add the verifcation, falsification, and unverification. Unverification is the not-excluded middle between true and false, provided by performative contradiction:
"If there is a unicorn, it is pink" is unverified in Step 2, by the perform
Suppsupplement: The performative contradiction in step 2 is a bit more tricky than I have written: As "Every B" means "Every B there is", "If B" does not mean "If there is a B", but "If it is one of the Bs there are", or "If one of the physically existing Bs is adressed". The s
Jeff K., List:
I always check Robin's dates at
https://peirce.sitehost.iu.edu/robin/rcatalog.htm against what I can find
by searching at commens.org, because the latter site typically reflects
more recent scholarship by the Peirce Edition Project. R 905 only comes up
in conjunction with "One, Two,
Thanks for the timely and helpful detective work, JAS. My friend and I are
primarily interested in the digression into Bayesianism, but I doubt not that
there's plenty of worthwhile stuff in the MS.
Best,
Jeff
From: Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Friday, February 5, 20
