Hi Mauro,
sorry, I dont know this notation with "!", "&&", and "II". Is it taught somewhere in the internet?
In your example, I would substitute "IF b THEN c ELSE d" and "IF e THEN f ELSE g".
We have twice two = 2 + 2 = 4 possibilities?
Helmut
04. Juni 2021 um 08:54 Uhr
"Mauro Bertani"
Il ven 4 giu 2021, 15:14 Helmut Raulien ha scritto:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> sorry, I dont know this notation with "!", "&&", and "II". Is it taught
> somewhere in the internet?
>
! Not
&& And
|| Or
> In your example, I would substitute "IF b THEN c ELSE d" and "IF e THEN f
> ELSE g".
> We have twice two
Cf: Logical Graphs, Truth Tables, Venn Diagrams • 7
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/06/04/logical-graphs-truth-tables-venn-diagrams-7/
All,
On the subject of Peirce’s ampheck operators
( https://oeis.org/wiki/Ampheck ), see also
our earlier discussion of their duality under
entitative and ex
John, List, All:
I have refuted these assertions over and over, point by point, so I am not
going to bother doing so yet again. I also see no need to "forward this
note to any [other] Peirce scholar(s)" since Bellucci and Pietarinen
already summarized the matter quite clearly and succinctly severa
Dear Ahti and Francesco,
As you know, I believe that Peirce's
insight of June 1911 led him
to develop a new version of EGs that is
superior to the older ones.
I have refuted Jon's claims, point
by point, and I stopped answering
him when they became repetitious
and irrelevant. But he continues
