John, List:
JFS: As Peirce explained in many passages in his writings, mathematics is
the universe of all possibilities.
Please provide exact quotations of the "many passages" where Peirce
supposedly equates mathematics with "the universe of all possibilities." As
the saying goes, "nobody can
Robert, List:
RM: Thus Jon-Alan reiterates André De Tienne's position and, after having
recognized the dependence of phaneroscopy on mathematics, claims that
Peirce defines it "broadly as the science which draws necessary conclusions
about hypothetical states of things."
I have previously
Jon:
The sentence you cite is merely the top row of CSP table of the trichotomy.
If you wish to play word games, count me out.
Cheers
Jerry
> On Aug 4, 2021, at 10:31 AM, Jon Alan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
> Jerry C., List:
>
> JLRC: CSP assertion of Quali-sign —> Sinsign —> Legi-sign forms the
Robert, List,
That quotation shows how mathematics is used in
phaneroscopy:
CSP: Thus, the mathematician does two very
different things: namely,
he first frames a pure hypothesis stripped
of all features which do
not concern the drawing of consequences from
it, and this he does
without
Jerry C., List:
No word games, just a simple request and a sincere question as I try to
understand your claim as quoted. I am well aware of
qualisign/sinsign/legisign as Peirce's 1903 division of all signs according
to the nature of the sign itself, which he later changes to
tone/token/type. I am
Helmut:
As a footnote to the exceedingly curious developments of scientific
terminologies, I would note that:
1. Robert Rosen denied the role of chemical emergence in his category-theory
based book, Life Itself.
2. The Scandia school of Biosemiotics adopts the evolutionary theory while
Cf: Descriptive and Normative • Discussion 1
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/08/04/descriptive-and-normative-discussion-1/
Re: Logical Graphs • Discussion 3
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/07/31/logical-graphs-discussion-3/
Re: Laws of Form
List, Helmut,
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 3:04 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
>
> "Emergence" for me seems to be a not yet logically fully explained
> phenomenon. My temporal assumption (not belief, in which I don´t believe) is,
> that it is individuation and downscaling.
You may wish to consider the