Jon, Jerry, List,
My interpretation of L376 depends on two ways of interpreting Peirce's L376.
The first way is the one followed by most scholars: Comparing the content to
an MS to everything written by Peirce and his sources prior to the date of the
MS and to everything written later by
Jerry, List:
JLRC: First, the question of modern modal symbolic logic is remote from
probability theory and even remoter from the Peircian notion of “qualisign,
sinsign, legisign”
Peirce developed Existential Graphs (EGs) as a diagrammatic notation for
formal systems of deductive logic. As
Jon, John, List:
Thanks to both of you for pushing the discourse toward the potential modern
interpretations of CSP’s thoughts (semes?).
I only have time for a couple of feedbacks, although your texts motivated
deeper deliberations.
1. First, the question of modern modal symbolic logic is
John, List:
I fully agree with your comment last week that "Peirce List is a
collaboration, not a competition," and I hope that you will receive this
response in that spirit. My questions are genuinely intended to help me
(and others) better understand your position, and I would appreciate direct
