Aw: Re: RE: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Is CP 5.189 A Syllogism? Can Categorial Analysis Be Worthwhile?

2016-05-04 Thread mig...@cegri.es
Addendum: At least up to 1902... (/Application to the Carnegie Institution/) Miguel - PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a messa

Aw: Re: RE: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Is CP 5.189 A Syllogism? Can Categorial Analysis Be Worthwhile?

2016-05-04 Thread mig...@cegri.es
Dear Jerry, List This may help to the development of Jerry Rhee’s question. Peirce, at least up to 1883, is satisfied with the sample of hypothesis (later abduction) given in “The new list of categories” (1867): “In an argument, the premises form a representation of the conclusion, because

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Recently published: Hitler and Abductive Logic

2015-07-14 Thread mig...@cegri.es
Dear John, In the last paragraph of an extremely interesting text, "A Theory of Probable Inference", W4: 408-450 (1883); Peirce points that "Side by side, then, with the well established proposition that all knowledge is based on experience, and that science is only advanced by the experiment