Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Topical Continuum

List: > On Jul 27, 2020, at 11:14 AM, John F. Sowa wrote: > > Therefore, it's essential to consider developments during the century > *after* Peirce in order to understand Peirce's early versions of those ideas. I agree. Yes, it is essential. To consider both the areas (domains) where his

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Topical Continuum

Jeff, I agree with your points and concerns.  The following issue is critical: JBD> The future of mathematics is hard to see--even for the best of mathematicians. Yes.  And Peirce was far ahead of his time in many aspects of mathematics, logic, psychology, and philosophy.   Therefore, it's esse

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Topical Continuum

Jeff, List: Thanks for your comments and questions. JD: Are you focusing on a definition adequate for a mathematical conception of continuity? Or, do you take yourself to have offered a definition of continuity that is adequate for philosophical inquiry in phenomenology, the normative sciences a

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Topical Continuum

e Professor Department of Philosophy Northern Arizona University (o) 928 523-8354 From: Jon Alan Schmidt Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2020 11:15:20 AM To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Topical Continuum List: I adapted some of my po

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Topical Continuum

List: I adapted some of my posts from last summer in threads like "Is Synechism Necessary?" (here ), "Vargas on Continuity" (here ), and "Defining Continuity" (here