Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Semiosis and Mathematical abduction

2021-08-16 Thread John F. Sowa
> John, List: > > You write: >> In any case, this is just one of many cases where it's essential to >> distinguish (a) mathematics as the infinite totality of all patterns >> and teories about them, (b) the people who discover mathematical >> theories, and (c) the application of mathematics in

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Semiosis and Mathematical abduction

2021-08-16 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
John, List: You write: > In any case, this is just one of many cases where it's essential to > distinguish (a) mathematics as the infinite totality of all patterns > and teories about them, (b) the people who discover mathematical > theories, and (c) the application of mathematics in other theoret

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Semiosis and Mathematical abduction

2021-08-14 Thread John F. Sowa
Gary F and Jerry, A computer theorem prover that generates all possibilities and systematically eliminates (by deduction) the ones that generate contradictions could be called an abduction machine. GF:  In the present context, this would imply that abduction is essentially mathematical, or at l

[PEIRCE-L] Pragmatic Semiosis and Mathematical abduction

2021-08-12 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
> On Aug 12, 2021, at 12:29 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote: > > In the present context, this would imply that abduction is essentially > mathematical, or at least that inquiry begins in the hypothetical realm. List: Gary F's assertion, while true for chemical sciences, is only a part of the