Bob,
The problem I see with that is it assumes that the classes on which the
induction works are given already. This is also a problem with Bayesian
methods. One of the problems in science is that the classes are often not
obvious, and scientific work often involves reclassifications. In the
At 11:55 AM 4/23/2015, Bob Logan wrote:
Could not a process of induction
not lead to abduction.
That's very likely what happens. A current rough picture of the
brain is the associative
small-world
network model.
See also
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn5012#.VTl9-SFViko
Howard
