[PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8466] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-27 Thread John Collier
Agreed, Frederik. I think this is really important. John From: Frederik Stjernfelt [mailto:stj...@hum.ku.dk] Sent: April 26, 2015 6:41 PM To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; Peirce-L 1 Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8466] Re: Natural Propositions, ps - Peirce's three distinctions are subtypes

[PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8466] Re: Natural Propositions,

2015-04-26 Thread Frederik Stjernfelt
ps - Peirce's three distinctions are subtypes of partial consideration - F Den 26/04/2015 kl. 18.37 skrev John Collier colli...@ukzn.ac.zamailto:colli...@ukzn.ac.za : Gary, I would say it is an abstraction from the perceptual judgment, where abstraction is understood as Locke’s partial