Edwina, lists,
Peirce most likely would have liked your chicken soup (not for any semiotic
reasons but for a gastronomic one) and Prigogine's Brusselator (for a
molecular semiotic reason).
All the best.
Sung
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
> So, Sung, you are now into
: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; PEIRCE-L
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Re: [biosemiotics:8761] The Universality of ITR
(Irreducible Triadic Relation) -- IV
So, Sung, you are now into declaring that SINCE Peirce was a chemist and even
had a chemical lab as a boy (doesn't every boy?), THEN, anything p
So, Sung, you are now into declaring that SINCE Peirce was a chemist and even
had a chemical lab as a boy (doesn't every boy?), THEN, anything posted
relating to chemistry, is relevant to the Peirce-L list. Before, your claim was
SINCE we 'think, write and speak in signs' and Peircean research w
