Re: [PEIRCE-L] phaneroscopic observation

Mike, List: Thanks for the corrected link. Apparently, the syntax for DOIs in *Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society* changed with the switch from JSTOR to Project MUSE as its online home, but the individual article PDFs still reflect the old format. I have brought this to the attention of

Re: [PEIRCE-L] phaneroscopic observation

Hi Jon, I am pleased to see you increasingly rely on prescission, what I am finding to be one of Peirce's most powerful methods in logical analysis. BTW, the link provided did not work for me. Here is a similar one that did: https://doi.org/10.2979/csp.2023.a900117. Hat tip for the reference

Re: [PEIRCE-L] phaneroscopic observation

Gary F., List: Thanks for providing a link to that updated section of *Turning Signs*, which strikes me as spot-on. As we have discussed here before, phaneroscopy and its pivotal place within Peirce's overall philosophy are all too often overlooked and/or misunderstood. Indeed, "The universes of d

RE: [PEIRCE-L] phaneroscopic observation

Gary, I enjoy browsing through your Turning Signs with their wealth of quotations and links to related topics. I also wanted to mention the quotations of the month by my wife Cora, who has a PhD in classical philology from Harvard. For years (up to 2022) she posted a quotation, usually from Gr

[PEIRCE-L] phaneroscopic observation

List, I recently updated a section of one chapter of my online book Turning Signs, a section that introduces Peirce’s phaneroscopy in such a way that those interested in the subject might want to have a look at it. It is only one small part of a much la