Dan,
ok, if Chomsky says so, he is wrong. I thought, he only means organisms, especially human children, that for them the
"Poverty of Stimulus Argument (POSA)" counts: “[The] narrowly limited extent of the available data … leaves little hope that much of the structure of language can be lear
Dan, if I would read all of Chomsky´s, and would not find him claiming, that his genetic grammar-module is not based on logic, then I would have to quote all he ever has written. The other way round would be easier. And: Refutation is a strong accusation, and I think the prosecutor has the burden o
Dan, List,
First i apologize for posting unrelated in the main thread.
I appreciate your argument and find it a great insight. Now, is this a refutation of Chomsky´s theory or not? A computer program perhaps does not need such a module, because it can research and develop language from
