Edwina, Alex, and Doug F,

In my note to Alex, I said that every diagram is a structure, and every 
structure is a diagram.  But I was too hasty in saying that.  I should have 
said that a diagram is a kind of structure that may be used to represent the 
significant aspects of something else.

A diagram could be isomorphic to the structure it represents, but more often 
than not, a diagram represents only some aspect of a structure that is 
considered significant for some purpose.  That significance is the Thirdness.

For example, an architect's blueprint for a building only represents a small, 
but important part -- namely a map of the major parts and how they fit 
together.  As a simplified outline, it would be Secondness.  But as an 
intentional plan, it would beThirdness.

In any case, it's safe to say that every diagram is a structure.  Its 
relationship to some other structure could be secondness if it if just happens 
to resemble it.  But the relationship would be thirdness if the person who drew 
the diagram had intended some purpose for it, such as a plan for building 
something, for teaching something, for selling something, for repairing 
something, or for destroying something.

And for Doug F, I would emphasize that the purpose of the diagram might be 
conscious in the mind of the person who draws it, but the reasoning methods in 
the cerebellum for constructing the diagram would not be conscious.  An expert 
painter freely uses techniques that may have required years of conscious 
thought to learn.

John

----------------------------------------
From: "Edwina Taborsky" <edwina.tabor...@gmail.com>

John, list

Thank you for an impressive paper and outline of diagrammatic thinking.

My question is - in your paper, do you explain how a diagram becomes [ as 
operative in the categorical mode of Thirdness] a  primary mediative force in 
the movement from sensation [of the object] to an Interpretant [of that 
object].  That is, the diagram is not always in a non-interfering  mode of 
Firstness or Secondness but can become, so to speak, agential [ as in ideology, 
as in a defective immune system,,as well, of course, when we identify the bird 
or insect outside the window].

Edwina
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu 
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the 
body.  More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to