Lists,

 

I’ve heard from Frederik that he’s dealing with a patch of ill health, so we
may not hear from him for a few more days. In the meantime maybe we can all
study Chapter 3 (at least up to chapter 5) so that we’ll be ready when
direct discussion of the dicisign doctrine resumes.

 

gary f.

 

From: Gary Fuhrman [mailto:g...@gnusystems.ca] 
Sent: 30-Sep-14 9:52 AM
To: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; 'Peirce List'
Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.4

 

Lists,

 

By this time it should be clear to readers of NP that the subject/predicate
structure of the proposition in Peirce’s logic is generalized in Peirce’s
semiotic as the indexical/iconic structure of the Dicisign. In §3.4 of NP we
meet the most radical and profound — and perhaps the most widely
unrecognized — aspect of Peirce’s Dicisign doctrine. To quote from NP, p.58:

 

[[ So, the basic function of the predicative aspect of the Dicisign is to
yield an iconic description of the sign's object. This, however, is not all.
By including the copula and the number of blanks involved in the predicate
given, the predicative side of the Dicisign includes all that is not
immediately indexical:

 

“The most perfectly thorough analysis throws the whole substance of the
Dicisign into the Predicate.” (Syllabus 1903, EPII, 281; 2.318)

 

This implies that the Predicate also includes the syntax of the Dicisign
making of the predicate-subject composite a claim, cf. the idea that the
predicate is “... representing (or being) an Icon of the Dicisign in some
respect” (Syllabus, EPII 279, 2.316), cf. below. The Predicate not only
depicts certain characters of the object, it also depicts the Dicisign
claiming those characters to pertain to the object. The Predicate iconically
describes that very aspect of the Dicisign—its syntax. So, the Predicate
operates on two levels simultaneously, on the object and metalanguage level,
as it were. ]]

 

Those who are looking into the “Kaina Stoicheia” text in conjunction with
this seminar will find Peirce’s innovative treatment of the “copula” (as “an
index involving an icon”) explained in EP2:308-10
(http://www.gnusystems.ca/KainaStoicheia.htm#4b ). Any questions about how
this relates to the Dicisisgn doctrine would be welcome!

 

gary f.

 

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to