of Philosophy
NAU
(o) 523-8354
From: Catherine Legg [cl...@waikato.ac.nz]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 10:15 AM
To: Jeffrey Brian Downard
Cc: biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee; Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8468] Re: Natural Propositions,
Jeff your post
Dear Catherine, List,
All I want to put in is my opinion, that there are two kinds -or basic parts- of metaphysics, clearly distinguished: One is experience (axioms), and the other is tautology (mathematics). Ok, mathematics too is based on axioms, but axioms are nothing but themselves, and
).
Perhaps we mean something different by “dynamical”. I use it in the physical,
not the mathematical sense.
John
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sent: April 27, 2015 10:58 AM
To: Peirce-L
Cc: John Collier
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8468] Re
...@me.com]
Sent: April 27, 2015 11:25 AM
To: Peirce-L
Cc: John Collier
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8468] Re: Natural Propositions,
John: you write:
I limit myself to dynamic structures.
then:
. I use it in the physical, not the mathematical sense.
Your very simple answer
it in the physical,
not the mathematical sense.
John
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sent: April 27, 2015 10:58 AM
To: Peirce-L
Cc: John Collier
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [biosemiotics:8468] Re: Natural Propositions,
John:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 8:24 AM, John Collier wrote:
I limit
John:
On Apr 27, 2015, at 8:24 AM, John Collier wrote:
I limit myself to dynamic structures.
Why?
Such an assertion indicates to me that your thinking is superficial.
As I have noted before, it is attempting to work a cross-word puzzle by using
only the across clues. Why does the puzzle
Jeff your post strikes me as a very helpful cordoning off of our inquiry
from psychologistic approaches, and it would be most beneficial if it were
heeded more widely in our contemporary context.
But then you write:
... philosophers who want to model their inquiries on a scientific
approach need
