ent much further down the road of inquiry than that, so my
reading of Peirce is still far from finished.
Gary f.
-Original Message-
From: Jon Awbrey [mailto:jawb...@att.net]
Sent: 6-Apr-16 11:45
To: g...@gnusystems.ca; 'Peirce List'
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: Systems Of Inte
Jon, list
I do remember your three-dimensional visualization of sign relations,
Jon. I had no intention of excluding you three-dimensional
presentations. I appreciate your work, it just is not my cup of tea.
My note to the list was NOT about sign relations, it was about
understanding the mea
Gary, List,
Surely you must understand that sign relations
are special cases of triadic relations, namely
those that satisfy a certain definition, and
that triadic relations are special cases of
relations in general.
If Peirce's various logical algebras, calculi, formal systems,
graphical syntax
Jon wrote,
[[ Peirce's existential graphs are a general calculus for expressing the same
subject matter as his earlier logic of relative terms and thus they serve to
represent the structures of many-place relations. ]]
Peirce wrote,
[[[ this system is not intended as a calculus, or apparatu
-Original Message-
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 05 April 2016 6:24 AM
To: Peirce List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation
Jon, John:
Thanks, Jon.
The question I raised was in order to seek alternative
interpretations of CSP’s
di
threes,
>> but it is also such an obvious error that I can't help but wonder if
>> we are missing something.
>> John Collier
>> Professor Emeritus and Senior Research Associate
>> University of KwaZulu-Natal
>> http://web.ncf.ca/collier <http://web.nc
List
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation
Jon, John:
Thanks, Jon.
The question I raised was in order to seek alternative interpretations of CSP’s
diagram of a chemical structure, ammonia. (NH3)
He showed it as a triad. The nitrogen atom was in the middle of the
help but wonder if
we are missing something.
John Collier
Professor Emeritus and Senior Research Associate
University of KwaZulu-Natal
http://web.ncf.ca/collier
-Original Message-
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 05 April 2016 6:24 AM
To: Peirc
erry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 05 April 2016 6:24 AM
> To: Peirce List
> Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Systems Of Interpretation
>
> Jon, John:
>
> Thanks, Jon.
>
> The question I raised was in order to seek alternative interpre
Jon, John:
Thanks, Jon.
The question I raised was in order to seek alternative interpretations of CSP’s
diagram of a chemical structure, ammonia. (NH3)
He showed it as a triad. The nitrogen atom was in the middle of the three
hydrogens, each at the end of a spoke. NOT a triangle.
But, th
I strongly agree, Jon. Reading meaning into artefacts of the representation is
not typically transparent. I would say that the whole symbol represents the
sign with its threefold character and that the node is not some separate
signifier. To put it on this level is, as you suggest, a category er
11 matches
Mail list logo
