Re: [PEIRCE-L] Triadic Relations

2015-02-03 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
Jon, John, List: Just a note that I think should be considered very deeply in the historical context of the potential for consistency within CSP's writings. And a couple of questions. See; W1: 256, Lecture VIII: Forms of Induction and Hypothesis (1865) Quote: The first distinction we found

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Triadic Relations

2015-01-29 Thread Jerry LR Chandler
John, List: For example in a function, like f=ma, m,a is an ordered pair, one from one domain and another from another domain such that their product is in another domain which is the range of the function. Huh? Yes, as stated, I agree with your sentence. And that a function can be

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Triadic Relations

2015-01-29 Thread John Collier
, but there are a lot of other constraints like valence and so on. Best, John -Original Message- From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com] Sent: January 29, 2015 11:07 PM To: Peirce-L Cc: Benjamin Udell; John Collier Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Triadic Relations John, List