RE: [biosemiotics:6635] Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions

2014-09-06 Thread Howard Pattee
Pattee’s comments on NP Chapters 1 and 2. At 04:36 PM 9/3/2014, Frederik wrote: FS: Charting how brains or psyches implement aspects of that chain [of reasoning], however important this is, does not change the importance of P's insistence that logic in the broad sense should be studied

RE: [biosemiotics:6635] Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions

2014-09-05 Thread Gary Fuhrman
Dear Lists, I'm happy to see that John Deely altered the subject line of his post, but John, I wish you'd taken Natural Propositions out of it completely. And the same goes for all the subject lines of the blizzard of posts yesterday none of which made any reference to the actual content of

Re: [biosemiotics:6635] Re: [PEIRCE-L] Natural Propositions

2014-09-04 Thread Edwina Taborsky
In reply to Howard- see my comments: At 04:47 PM 9/3/2014, Frederik wrote: Adding semiotic concepts to your description of physical events can be done, but it does not really add to our understanding of them - while in our understanding of biological events, semiotic concepts are