arguments. For signs that have these three
>> characteristics, do they have the internal structure of a triadic relation
>> connecting its parts? I think the answer is "yes". As such, some signs
>> consist of triadic relations--even if they are the first correlate of
of Philosophy
Northern Arizona University
(o) 928 523-8354
-
From: Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 5:29 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu [5]
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Methodeutic for resolving quotation
wars (was Continuity... Edwina, List:
Y
are the first correlate of a
> further triadic relation.
>
> Yours,
>
> Jeff
> Jeffrey Downard
> Associate Professor
> Department of Philosophy
> Northern Arizona University
> (o) 928 523-8354
>
> ------
> From: Jon Alan Schmidt
> Sent:
University
(o) 928 523-8354
-
From: Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 5:29 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Methodeutic for resolving quotation
wars (was Continuity... Edwina, List:
Yes, I refuse on ethical grounds
Yours,
Jeff
Jeffrey Downard
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
Northern Arizona University
(o) 928 523-8354
-
From: Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 5:29 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] M
Associate Professor
Department of Philosophy
Northern Arizona University
(o) 928 523-8354
From: Jon Alan Schmidt
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 5:29 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Methodeutic for resolving quotation wars (was
Continuity.
Edwina, List:
Yes, I refuse on ethical grounds to deviate from Peirce's own usage of
these terms. Again, either a Sign is a Representamen with a mental
Interpretant (CP 2.274, EP 2:273 and CP 2.242, EP 2:291; both 1903), or
"Sign" and "Representamen" are synonymous (SS 193; 1905). He
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}JAS - The Commens entry refers to definitions of the Representamen.
I am talking about the full TRIAD - not the mediative part, aka, the
Representamen, of the Triad. You repeatedly refuse to differentiate
between the two
